
Synopsis
The
Order of Time Summarized
René
and the Time of His
Life
'Six
dialogues between René, the seeker of
happiness
and Aadhar, the teacher of
filognosy.'

Introduction
So
René went to the Scientific School of
Magic and learned many spells and skills to
be in control of his life and destiny. But he
was dissatisfied. There were a few things he
still didn't know. He didn't really know how
to sustain his happiness or to find a lasting
closure. He didn't know how to be fearless
either, nor did he really know about his own
name. In other words: René, though
being challenged for his skills by his
education, still had to find the Time of His
Life.
So
let's start with the name. The seeker of
happiness asks the questions and Anand
Aadhar, his alter-ego in the form of the in
the West raised yoga practicioner, gives the
answers.
What
does my name René mean?
René,
a french word for being reborn, is called
dvija in Sanskrit, which as well means
the being reincarnated as the having started
a new life within this life. Having a new
life also implies that one reorients. For
that purpose we have these
conversations.
And
now fearlessness.
How
does René become
fearless?
Taking
initiation by this inquiring with a
representative of the yoga discipline like
me, has he, in order to become fearless, to
develop another state of mind. In fact he
needs to find comfort within himself in such
a manner that he sees that to the basic three
of the reality of the soul making up 1) the
fields of his action, 2) the principles of
his conduct and 3) his life game within the
societal order, all people properly
coordinate in leading to a more stable form
of consciousness. To be fearless he has to
find the peace of that state of mind that to
actions, thoughts and words 1) doesn't let
him down in action doing his thing, 2)
doesn't leave him in the dark of ignorance in
times of trouble, and 3) doesn't betray his
confidence, not even upon death. In other
words: he must find a time of living that
cannot be defeated by anything. Thus he finds
meaning and is he, rid of his fear, capable
of facing any challenge.
Next
happiness.
So
how is René happy then?
For
the sake of his happiness he needs to follow
a post-graduate course with the Master of
Filognosy named Aadhar, his alter ego, a
spiritual teacher representing the Lord of
Yoga who helps him to find his way in society
with the magic of his science and be
comfortable with himself and others.
Filognosy constitutes the to the western mind
adapted science of finding and keeping love
for that type of knowledge which makes
oneself, being engaged in service, happy and
makes others, that are of a likewise respect,
happy too. In fact the two cannot be
separated. Filognosy defines the reality of
the soul, and concerns not just the knowledge
of school books, wisdom, spells and ancient
arts. No, it is the science of finding love
for the method, the facts, the art, the
transcendence, the person, and the defense of
the cause of having a good time with all
people together as a society.
The
course 'Filognosy or the Order of
Time'
So
what does the curriculum consist
of?
René,
it is divided in three with each two
sections.
-
I Science:
-
Section a: Sobering-up;
to become free from illusion in facing the
essential facts of time.
-
Section b: Field-control;
to develop balance in the different fields
of action.
-
II Spirituality:
-
Section a: Emotional
Expression:
to manifest himself analytically
responsible with a proper insight in
matters so that he with an art-form like
singing or painting thus also may find his
inner balance.
-
Section b: Value
control:
to control basic spells - also in the
sense of periods of time - for personal
stability and well-being and meet the
conditions for endurance in
function.
-
III The person
-
Section a: Identity
control:
to play the game of order so to find and
live your life's mission.
-
Section b: Rhetoric:
what you must say to others in order to
promote and defend the cause.
Are
you ready? Pick a section, and I, Aadhar,
will explain it to you, René, in the
dialogue to it of us discussing the duality
of the threefold of filognosy as mentioned,
which constitutes the comprehensive approach
of spiritual knowledge that vedically is
called the 'darshanas' of the
'âtma-tattva': the visions of
the reality of the self, the perspectives on
the principle of the soul, the six forms of
spiritual love for the knowledge that you
need to be happy and lead others to that
happiness too.
Dialogue
one I-a: Sobering up
To
be free from illusion René, you have
to face the facts of life and the material
universe. You have to see them as they are.
Before doing anything, before taking a
decision, just take a good look to make sure
what you are dealing with.
So
what about the subject of illusion and
time?
Dear
René, time is the life of the universe
consisting of the holy trinity of physics:
time, space and matter. Time makes dull
matter alive. In fact is everything in
existence alive, not only moving beings and
nonmoving one's like plants, but also stones
have a life although it's a bit of a dull
life. If you take a careful look deep into
so-called dead matter you'll discover that it
is just hard energy, energy frantically
buzzing in itself so that it is hard. Soft
matter of living beings is more dynamic, more
relaxed, more vital, more responsive, but
also of a more temporary form: it obeys the
laws of time in a certain way; a way that is
programmed not just by an eventual culture,
but that is built into the genes of all
beings, into the very cells of all the
bodies, just like a program is installed in a
computer. This programmed life we call
conditioned life because it was generated and
fixed by conditions in the past and so
constitutes the adaptation of the organism to
it's environment. Part of the conditioning
belongs to the hardware of the body and
cannot be changed, it is responsible for the
form of your body and the basic functions.
Another part, the cultured part, of it was
learned during one's lifetime and is more
amenable, like it is with taking cereal or a
roll each morning; you have the choice.
Nature controls you, nurture you can control.
Thus are, to a certain degree of our own
control, all of our lives conditioned, from
the lives of single plants to the lives of
entire planets. But we are not simple
machines that are preprogrammed and
self-programmed. There is position of a
certain indeterminacy in our material
existence too. We so thus have some freedom
to oversee our lives and intervene on that
level of norms and standards. We at any
moment may decide to what lead we take with
our for the rest pretty much in behavioral
patterns fixed vital matter and genes. We may
so be concrete as material forms doing
material things or we may be engaged in more
abstract matters that lie closer to the
behavioral program and the authority of the
programming that has control over us. The
latter position of the core-interest we call
metaphysical, transcendental or risen above
or beyond and with that we will deal in the
next set of sections of part two of our
curriculum concerning the spiritual. Let us
first take a look at the ways and problems of
our straight material existence.
What
are these problems?
Dear
René, we like to be alive and move
around, but because of our free will things
are not as certain as we would like. Your
fellow man may distance himself or have an
accident or end up in jail doing the wrong
things, or may not be that good as a fellow
man at all: he may abuse or neglect you and
not treat you respectfully or accept you the
way you are. And also your friends and
intimates may betray you out of selfishness
or give you trouble with lies, violence,
greed and abuse. Of course you must be
educated and capable of meeting challenges,
and thus you are in need of support, and that
need to be in control from your side is one
problem. Another problem is that relatives,
friends and outsiders on their turn also need
to be educated and thus are in need of
support to be in control with acting properly
and respectfully. And so do these lessons
also apply to them. On top of that does the
greater of nature also give problems like
with heat, cold, floods and earthquakes, and
so must also that problem also be accounted
for.
What
causes these problems?
Dear
René, the problems we human beings may
have are there because of illusion: we do not
see the things of matter and life always as
they are. We do not right away see that just
serving the body and not the soul of the
metaphysical nuclear interest, means that one
has no good direction then of one's behavior
and that one neither has a coordinated and
safe society of self correction one may thus
rely upon. The reason for this thus is the
material desire; people want to have it
different as is indicated from the nuclear
interest. One is then, with the superficial
of only living by the matter missing the
quality of the soul, dissatisfied or bored,
annoyed or lusty and so we may find ourselves
doing things that we shouldn't do. Of course
should wrongs be corrected, and so can
dissatisfaction, boredom, annoyance and lust
be justified. Sometimes it is good to do
things different and correct oneself, but
sometimes is it, bewildered by the material
interest forgetting to what norm we would
have to correct, not so good and leads it to
disaster, chaos, mayhem and even war; to even
more dissatisfaction, boredom, annoyance and
lust. Thus humanity can find itself on a
downward course leading to hell. One can go
from bad to worse or find the right path back
again. So, not to end up wrong, we must be
sure of having a good plan to serve that
nuclear interest of the soul, to be sure that
we see things correctly so that we may
respect the facts of life as they are and so
are able to take the right
decisions.
What
is the correct way of looking at the things
of life then?
Dear
René, we have scientific guidelines,
moral guidelines and religious and political
guidelines. In these first two sections we
deal with the scientific ones. There is, in
science, first of all a method we need to
follow to make sure what the truth of things
is. This method consists of first determining
a subject of study, let's say dogs: 'I like
dogs' e.g. You can next say what the problem
is with dogs, e.g. that they bite and bark
and have to eat other animals. These are
called the thesis and the antithesis exposing
the problem we want to study. Next there is a
counter-argument needed to solve the problem:
dogs must be on the leash and cannot be
allowed to kill for their food, we must do
that for them. Then we may draw a conclusion:
yes it is possible to love dogs and keep them
as pets, provided they are properly taken
care of with you having nothing against
killing other animals for their food. Next we
can summarize that that is maybe so for all
other animals: yes we can keep animals in
general provided we take proper care of them,
but dogs and cats actually not thus if we are
vegetarians that do not want to kill animals.
Thus have we by weighing arguments and
counter-arguments found out about dogs. So
let's now extend this argument of the method
of arriving at the truth to the subject of
life in general. Life in general, we saw
already with the first question, is
characterized as a function of time. Time
tells whether we have a life or not. No time,
no life at all. Time is thus fundamental to
the matter of life. So to answer the question
of looking at life correctly we engage in a
systematic fashion along the lines of the
method we discussed with the dogs. So first
we say time is life. The problem is that time
also puts an end to our lives and because of
that we have to live in fear of dying and
thus eventually hate and fear time. The
counter argument now is that time is not just
linear from one moment to the other leading
to death, it also makes patterns: the
conditionings we talked about previously.
These patterns, laid down as records of time
in our genes and our cultures, show that time
is not just a killer but also a maker, a
creator; time is like a form of God
responsible for the order of life of all
living beings. This is classically respected
with the dictum 'as above so below';
as the order of time is in the sky, thus is
it created on earth. We must also add to that
that time linear and cyclic as it is, also
has an opposite of timelessness which we call
the experience of time or the consciousness
of time. The conclusion then, to make from a
thesis/antithesis and counter-argument the
following third step in the method, is that
time is indeed destructive and fearful, but
that we can live with time for its positive
properties of conditioning and consciousness
offering us the certainty of structure and
the awareness to make choices. The summary to
conclude the method is that time and life can
be appreciated with a proper division of
respect, if we properly discriminate between
the different forms of time. Not doing so we
would be in the illusion that time and life
just being linear are useless and all bad
meaningless would be leading to death only.
Not seeing the reality of this threefoldness
of time we would have to suffer in the fear
and darkness of ignorance. And now we can
cope with our times of living as they are,
free from illusion. We sobered up by the
methodical respect for the full reality, the
truth of the matter.
Is
that all we have to?
Well,
no René. There is much more about
illusion concerning the subject of time and
also more outside of it. But what we now said
about time is the most basic. To conclude to
the reality of cyclic time and time
consciousness we have a few more things to
investigate with our method. We didn't talk
about the order of time yet. We only
concluded to three different types of time,
not to any schedule for respecting the time.
If we want a society of people living in
service we need schedules, agreements on our
times of working and sleeping and such. At
night for instance we want no noise and
during the day we want our actions to be
useful and effective like taking diner
together e.g. Thus we need clocks and
calendars that tell us what date it is and
how late it is with the cyclic of time so
that we can coordinate our actions and make
appointments.
So
how are we in illusion or else in respect of
the truth with our schedules?
Dear
René, to the order of time of the
humans on this planet we have different
cultures that complicate the matter. That is
one side of the coin of order. At the other
side we have different references for
respecting the cyclic of time as it is from
nature. We can set our days to the moon, to
the stars or to the sun. All these natural
phenomena together make up, with the
forcefield of the ether, the complete of the
natural pattern of linear/cyclic time and
consciousness we cannot really deny not to be
beaten by a meaningless exitence.
So
what is the truth of the cyclic of linear
time and its consciousness?
Dear
René, let us apply the method again.
Like we did with the dogs and the division of
time in three. Now as our thesis we have the
order of time as our culture of respect and
that's what we like. The problem posed to it
in opposition is that that culture of our
calendar and clock might be of illusion since
we deviate from other cultures and from
nature with it, and that we thus are not
firmly rooted and engaged down to earth and
to our fellow man with the matters of time on
this planet as they are. The counter-argument
next is that it is not such a problem at all
since we can tell the difference, correct a
clock and leap a calendar, talk it over in
politics, or perform a ritual of respect to
fight the offense of disrespect. The
conclusion we then may draw is that our
preferred order of time it's possible
illusory effect can be fought
with
a clock running to the
sun
and a calendar running to the moon, as well
as by political or philosophical debate, by
religious exercises of respect and by the
conscious comparing of two calendars and
clocks or by comparing those indications to
the actual positions of sun, moon and stars.
The summary is following that all the
cultures of time on this planet with each
their own habits of time management may find
a common order in science offering clocks
that run to the sun for the sake of validity,
in religions that remind us constantly of the
original nature and the necessary morality to
it, in political debates that fight illogic,
unreason and estrangement in compensation and
by multicultural tolerance and mutual respect
that permits Muslims to bow to the sun and
Hindus to celebrate to the moon while the
Christians celebrate the dates of Christmas
and other holidays on the solar calendar. In
the last section we will further expound on
the subject of time politics. As for now have
we with this methodical investigation into
the truth of the order of time thus uncovered
the way to fight illusion in general and live
in peace despite of our
differences.
And
how about the timelessness in experiencing
time?
With
that subject we will deal in the next
division of spirituality and the person, dear
René.
How
exactly should we do this what you told us
without a scientific training in astronomy,
theology, philosophy and
politics?
Dear
René, to check the time of nature we
have sundials and a tempometer
on the internet to check the position of sun
out, we have calendars that tell the lunar
phases so that you can be regular to the moon
if you want, and to the stars we have a time
on the calendar - which at the moment GMT is
the night from the 6th to the seventh of July
- demarcating the dynamic point in the
celestial sky around which all the stars
revolve in the galaxy. This time on the
calendar that can be called the galactic new
year of the time at which the earth is
closest to the galaxy center, shifts with
about 20 minutes a year ahead through the
calendar (the so-called precession of the
equinox). The stars can thus be celebrated
with an annual holiday collectively or
individually with your birthday that each
galactic year then falls about twenty minutes
later. Thus we can be of an astronomical
respect for the sun, the moon, the stars and
the force field of the ether keeping them
together. As for theology we have churches,
temples and mosques with trained theologians
to tell and teach you all about the respect
that would be needed in this to live for God.
Concerning the philosophy we have paradigms
or thought models of science ruling the
universities and other institutes of
education and for the political respect we
have political parties to organize the debate
about this all.
And
are these different option of time-management
all equally good or is there a certain
preference?
To
accord with nature, the original reality of
time that by evolution shaped our life, saves
one the energy of the compensation needed in
case one does not accord. Think of
work-shifts in commerial enterprising that
allow people in a family or early
relationship less of a life together when
there's someone snoring all the time, or that
exhaust someone sooner if one must change
from a day-shift to a nightshift. But to have
more energy doesn't mean that one is better
in dealing with it. So did e.g. Islam not
succeed in conquering Europe at the end of
the Middle Ages, while they did accord better
with the sun and the moon than the Europeans
did who christian wise burned heretics of
sun- and moon-worship at the stake. It is so
that in compensations like bridging matters
religiously, politically or scientifically,
with rituals, discussions, and paradigmatic
treatises, one may develop a lot of good
qualities and efectivity. But given a certain
uniform, good will with the options available
in timemanagement and the need of an
efficient approach, one could say that - like
preventing being better than finding a cure -
to accord is better than bridging and that,
to stick to our examples, Christianity is not
as easily done with Islam in this respect as
it might wish.
What's
the magic I've learned here?
Dear
René, that you don't have to perform
any magic trick to be in control with
yourselves and with the matters you have to
deal with, but, better engaged, can
experience great satisfaction in filognosy,
the love to know, comprehend and act to the
benefit of all living beings.
Can
I be happy simply countering illusion this
way?
Dear
René, life can offer you challenges
and make it difficult for you to be happy,
but holding on to this lesson for yourself is
happiness within reach, provided your
acceptance that in this filognosy, this love
for knowledge, there are a few more lessons
to learn indeed.
Dialogue
two: I-b Field-control
This
is a scientific class about facts. The fact
that matters after the methodical concerns
about time in the previous section in
filognosy is the fact of the so-called fields
of action. To fill your calendar it is
important to develop knowledge of and balance
in the different fields of action.
What
are those fields?
Dear
René, please take a good look around
you. Observe the facts of material life. As
you see there are private homes and there are
shops, theaters and pubs down town. There are
also meeting places ruled by a certain
concept of association: clubs for sport,
houses of prayer, song and music, respecting
nature a certain way and so on, and there are
also offices, schools, factories and other
places where people do their work. These
different material buildings in your town are
thus recognized as the four fields of action
that you have to count with in your
life.
Count
with?
You
have to literally count with them. You have
to figure out on the clock and the calendar
when to do what since you can't afford to
miss and fail in any of them of you want a
full life. The idea is that in your life, in
order to be full and complete, you must
consciously plan your actions. This is
because you live with others. Alone you can
be spontaneous, together you must manage to
appointments of time. That is the so-called
mûrti, cross, the trouble, you have to
carry as a sacrifice for your own good. It is
required for your filognosy, your physical
and mental happiness and health to the
different perspectives of life thus, that you
will not be frustrated missing anything of
life. Let no one tell you that any of these
fields would be bad, off limits or
condemned.
What
is the order behind it, what is the essence
of each of these fields?
There
is the oneness of life and the manifold of
forms. This is a fundamental twofold division
of truth we call the 'basic reality' we have
to respect with the ancient dictum of
'oneness in diversity'. Just like in
the previous class the dictum ruled 'as above
so below' to be in full respect with the
facts of life and time, is this section ruled
by this dictum. It is also called the duality
of quantity versus quality. Oneness or to be
unified is a quality of fundamental
importance. To be divided within oneself and
therefrom in the community estranged, belongs
to the terminology of the psychiatrist. Now
will we further expound on the order of
managing the time in respect of the different
fields. The two aspects of the quantity and
the quality of life are known by the two
dualities shipping with it. For the quality
there is the oneness in abstract thought like
the idea of God or a shared spiritual ideal
opposing the oneness in the engagement in the
concrete of matter and material actions as
the being engaged in activities during the
holidays or actions of one's work. From the
quantity there is a likewise duality of the
diversity of the individual of being on
oneself opposing the diversity of the social
interest of being together. Putting the thus
found four factors in a table you will see
the four fields appearing that we have
assigned the four labels business, private,
public and club.
1)
The business field
(individual/concrete). As a child your
business is attending school. When you're
older your business is making money or
doing a volunteers job in charity to be
grateful living on the dole. Whatever
you're good at, this is how you serve or
plan to serve your fellow man and the
society at large. This is a cornerstone of
your life from which you find your
self-esteem and your sanity. Not being
able to act in this field, people speak of
unemployment or else godlessness. Somehow
you must make sense with your servitude to
express your gratitude for what others,
including your forefathers, did for you.
This is where you, for a good conscience,
even the balance to individually enjoy the
things of life. This interest in the
individual of concrete matters is also
called 'the field of the elements of
matter'.
2)
The private field
(individual/ideal). Sitting at home is
an individual position in which you seek a
certain quality in escaping from
influences from the concrete outside world
that entices you into competition and
accomplishment. It is the private field
that belongs to the ideals of freedom with
which you counter the concrete pressures
of a material life. There you enjoy your
family relations, your hobbies and do you
seek and give love, confidence, support,
familiarity, and security. In this
individual field interest is where you,
with the help of a religion or philosophy,
develop your individual quality: your
intelligence. This individual interest in
the ideal is also called 'the field of
intelligence'.
3)
The public field (social/concrete).
This is the field of free association. You
go downtown to the market, to go shopping
and to sit in a restaurant, go to the
cinema or a theater and meet the people
also living in your community. This binds
the people in the society best: to be
equal, moving freely and reciprocally
enjoying the services of each other. How
can one serve and expect to be appreciated
if one doesn't appreciate the service of
others oneself? This is where the money
made is spent and the friends and
acquaintances are made and met. This is
where you party and celebrate in all
freedom going wherever you want like
during your vacation. This is the local,
national, continental and worldly of the
concrete social interest of you and
everybody else. This is also called 'the
field of the false ego' or the, socially
confirmed, personal identification with
material matters and communal
presence.
4)
The club field (social/ideal).
Together with others you need to feed and
strengthen your soul, your reason and
moral fiber too; together is the spirit
maintained stronger as doing it all alone,
one straw breaks easily, but a bundle can
wipe the streets making a broom. This is
the spiritual, the by a certain set of
rules determined, field where people find
the meaning of life in the togetherness of
exercising respect in singing and praying,
listening, speaking, eating, dancing,
strolling, sporting and remembering and
such. This is where the control is found
from the definition of one's favorite
association as being sportive, artistic,
cultural, religious or alternative
spiritual. This ideally conceived interest
in social matters is also called 'the
field of the non-manifest' since it is not
so clear in what form the spiritual
principles should be respected, because
the soul, just as God being the supreme of
it, is found always beyond all material
grasp as a presence in the
beyond.
So
how do these fields add up with the order of
time we discussed?
Most
importantly, René, one should remember
that in order to be hearty and hale one must
keep balance. From the fields above one may
surmise that business matters must be weighed
against religious matters or club matters and
that private matters must be contrasted and
counterbalanced with public matters. They
both form a contrast of incompatible
opposites. These two dimensions defining the
separation of the fields in time, that
together make up the basis of all the fields
of action, thus require that those basic
fields are assigned a separate position in
time if we want to put ourselves
comprehensively on the calendar and have an
according fullness of life
together.
Now
we have two dimensions with one
calendar....
Well,
René, actually our calendar is set up
dually. Culturally we have the days of the
week contrasting the dates. In filognosy
though we build on certain knowledge,
validated scientific knowledge, so that the
days of the week are replaced by likewise
days fixed to the moon. Weekdays as we know
culturally are commercially conceived in
political debate and thus uncertain. They do
not directly refer to natural happenings.
That is the distinction we have to make in
order to be certain. Though derived from the
moon are normal weeks not leaped to the moon
and thus do they not constitute a natural,
independent variable we can count upon. They
are, being subject to political decision
making and economic ulterior motives, in fact
uncertain in being manmade and part of a
materialistic consciousness that, with only
the pretense of a freedom of choice,
constitutes bondage and is thus not fit for
the stability of happiness. We go for the
filognostic consciousness of the
scientifically certain knowledge of the
positions of the sun and the moon as they
are. We so to speak worship God preferably
directly, rather not by means of 'political
demigods' telling it us different to prove
themselves or the money useful. But still it
is, as said with the four options of
time-management, scripturally allowed to
worship time by mediation of the at times so
very ugly 'demigods' of the 20th century
materialistic and commercial standard time
like there are the warlords Hitler and
Napoleon, who are the 'champions' of
respectively taking around and instituting
zone time and mean time in Europe
e.g.
Sun
and moon and the fields, how do they add
up?
The
matters of the false ego and the private life
are associated with the sun. Out in the
bright light of the day one manifests one's
body in respect of the true (demi-)god of
that order, the god of the sun. Defying that
divinity one is an heretic of that order and
doomed to suffer instability of motive and
consciousness, and that we don't want. So are
private and public matters best settled by
the order of the sun, viz. settled by the
dates on the solar calendar. Think of the
private and public birthdays and holidays.
Equally are the other two polar fields of
one's business- and club-life best settled to
the order of the moon. The moon is there as a
fixation in the sky. It is always fixed on
the sun as the first devotee and leading
godhead of that order. Matters of club-life
are all fixed. A club cannot change its rules
lest it becomes another club. So it resists
change and has to be taken as it is or else
be denied. The same way it is with
businesses. Each business, each job agreement
is ruled by contract and a business plan.
Another plan is another business. Also that
department is as fixed as the moon is. Thus
are the two contrasted on the lunar calendar
just like the previous two fields of the sun
were contrasted on that calendar. So we have
a type of order in which business days never
coincide with club-days and private days
never coincide with days of public
socialization. Playing golf or tennis
together as a business meeting is simply an
association in sport to cover the lunar
dimension better; one still separately has to
sit down in an office to check and talk over
contracts and sign papers then. The two
dimensions of sun and moon by nature having a
different discrete rhythm do coincide though.
Thus can business be mixed with socializing
in public and can the private interest be
mixed with club-life. Also can the business
interest be met privately and the club-life
coincide with public socializing intentions.
Thus we have a variegated, dynamic life
covering all fields in a stable,
nonmaterialistic but certain respect of time.
In the last section will I also dilate on the
timing of your life with these fields in the
context of the regulation of the civil
virtues.
And
what if I don't care about
that?
Neglect
of this necessary balance will go at the cost
of your physical and mental well-being. You
will be troubled by the psychology of
consonance that says that all you do is good.
Thus you will defend your imbalance and thus
you will politicize going crazy saying that
club-life is bad or that going out is bad or
that all business is bad or that all private
matters are corrupt. You then, to check your
madness with your resentment against the
balanced life, will find a political party of
nepotism to it that possibly cheats you into
a fake life of living in enmity opposing
others that are possibly equally disturbed in
their field control another way. Thus you
will debilitate and lose your synergy, your
ability to cohere socially. Kind seeks kind
and in the will for power born from that you
will, with the wrong friends getting
entangled, slide down, being tempted into
injustice and make yourselves enemies which
will shorten your life span, steal your
luster, and make your phony one-sided life a
hell. In other words you will fall in
ignorance and suffer all kinds of
psychological symptoms. Public personalities
e.g. often suffer from this in the loss of
their free association; they start hating the
public that they serve but that doesn't allow
them a full life.
So
all politicians are wicked
asses?
No
of course not. The politicians get the blame
because they are responsible for the order in
the society. But the problem is found with
everyone. There are good and bad people in
this as you know, but the majority lives a
not so pure mix of that materially motivated
ego-passion that may carry such a malicious
shadow and the by the principle motivated
soul-given goodness. The politicians mediate
between the wanted and the viable in society.
The so often inevitable problems of the
impurity of compromises are professional
hazards, calculated risks to them; but
certainly is this problem not conducive to
their stability in office. The democratic
rule that mostly misses the less compromising
nobility of a more scientific, personal and
enduring systematic respect for God and His
time can also be regarded as a necessity. We
need the democracy in order to neatly rid
ourselves of the less conscientious 'nobles',
politicians and parties who for a while with
populism managed to cheat the voters into
consent. The integer ones neatly serve, for
as long as they can, a certain purpose of
public interest despite of all kinds of party
interests and other setbacks of being an
ego-target. The integer ones do not confuse
the membership of a political party with a
function in one of the to be expected
election groups filognostically set up to
study, discuss, make and amend laws for a
certain state department or sub-department.
The real purpose of political parties is to
serve the filognostic order and not to
confuse the issue by living in secret and
overt envy, enmity and feeble-minded debility
on the one-sided options derived from their
imbalanced lifestyles and ulterior
motives.
Expected
elections groups?
We
will discuss this option for the legislative
order, associated with the identities of man
in his societal game of order, in the later
section of the rhetoric class. As for now you
should remember that imbalance in the fields
of action leads to the illusions of political
nepotism or to other kinds of false oneness
in pathology or neurosis. The pathology takes
it out at the cost of others, the neurosis
doubts itself into an ineffective spirit
missing a firm ground in the full of the
human reality as well as a proper discipline
with the soul. The psychopathology creates
victims on a battlefield and the neurosis
ends raving mad being psychotic in an asylum.
Thus in order not to harm yourself or others:
always keep the balance in respect of the
fields of action.
O.k.
understood, but, scientifically, how about
that leaping with the order of
time?
Leaping
is important to keep the schedule of time
tuned to nature, without it one loses touch
with the force field of the ether and becomes
one invalid in one's time-respect. One is not
of this planet anymore if one doesn't respect
it's order. So, in order to be firmly rooted
here and stable in consciousness, are
calendars leaped, the lunar as well as the
solar ones. But filognostically with the
lunar calendar leaped to the sun we have to
admit that the solar year, itself being
leaped every four years when necessary, is
decisive and that the lunar year as such does
not really exist in the sky. Therefore we do
not leap the lunar order, just like Islam
does, but we either make for a lunar year
other than for the socalled lunation of four
lunar phases. 29.5 days is the length of the
lunar cycle and its signal days are
traditionally the new moon (roman:
kalends), the full moon (ides)
and the half moon (nones), and no
other. That is what happens to be the
astronomical agreement called a lunation. The
solar calendar is filognostically, viz.
according the vedic scripture and also
according the classical roman order from
before Constantine AD 325, divided with the
divisions of the moon. Twelve months are
divided in 24 15-day fortnights which each
for themselves, to our traditions and to the
moon, may be divided in two weeks as we are
used to with the addition of an extra day of
leaping at the end of each fortnight. This
day we call a cakra day of study and fasting
(next to the other cakra days of labor and
free association in the public sphere) on
which it is inauspicious to plan for any
material endeavor because of breaking with
the regular order of the week. Thus do we
with the solar order, which we thus call the
cakra order, match with the order of the
moon, not having more divisions than are
needed or are provided by nature. One is
called a fool when one goes beyond
necessity.
No
foolishness sticking to the bare necessities
of a stable consciousness of
time?
Exactly,
that concludes our second talk.
Dialogue
three: II-a Emotional
Expression
It
is important to express yourself. Mere study
and knowing give no stability or proper
learning. It is the practice that makes
perfect.
Is
that why we talk?
Yes,
but talking is not enough. Talking is very
cortical, viz. of the higher regions in the
brain, and is ruled by the repression of
emotions from the lower centers of the brain.
Emotions in the mode of passion taking over
reason ruin the understanding if we do not
consciously control them beforehand by song
and exercise. It is an individual
responsibility of not just
politicians.
The
philosopher must sing?
Right,
so it is. There will only be stability of
consciousness if we do not just balance our
activities in the fields of action in the
outer world, but also to the internal fields
of the different functions of our brain. Our
own body with all its functions of action and
senses of perception requires a balancing in
all its three dimensions: the cortical as
opposed to the emotional (the vertical
dimension) the spatial or parallel against
the time-sense or the serial (lateral/
temporal) and the initiative as opposed to
the receptive functions (frontal/occipital
regions).
Is
that also associated with the order of
time?
Yes
René that is so, but this concerns
more your activities with the clock than with
the calendar. The day is naturally divided in
a light and dark period. During the light
period we are active and during the night we
rest. So there are twelve hours of action and
twelve of rest on the average. The twelve of
action need to be balanced in six hours of
service to others and six hours in service of
your own interests. The nighttime is divided
in six hours of sleep, rest for the body, and
six hours of doing something at home, to have
no stress for the spirit. Thus is initiative
and reception balanced following the light of
the day. This covers the frontal and
occipital regions, the front an back-portion
of the brain. Insufficiently being of action
as with unemployment or else godlessness, may
lead to an overactive back-brain which is a
mark of schizophrenia: the brain may then in
a psychotic break or decompensation invent
its own illusory action or seek forgetfulness
in intoxication, but then does the imagined
not compute with the reality in the actions:
one is factually crazy. Or either too much
actions lead to, as we already saw,
pathological abuse of other people or the
greater society; respectively known as
psychopathy and sociopathy with the types of
crime belonging to that. Therefore: never
meditate by prolonged watching television
during the day. Never, as an adult, sleep
more than six hours. And never work for
others more than six hours each day (36 hour
working week of six days of labor is ideal),
nor engage in hobbies or household chores for
more than six hours a day. Thus you will lead
a balanced, stable life conducive to
happiness.
Conducive?
That itself doesn't make me
happy?
Well
of course, the order of time, which you need
to be in control and of respect with the
force field of the ether, is just one of the
conditions to meet. Let's first try the
healthy and sane of coping with the tricks
and pitfalls of time in general and modern
time especially. Culturally we were, in the
twentieth century, not directly prepared for
clocks and schedules defying the commands and
dynamics of mother nature who gave us birth
from father time, so we understandably had
some historical difficulties with our
self-control.
How
about the other two internal dimensions
then?
As
said is the intellectual of the cortex
functionally poised against the emotional of
the lower centers. This can thus be actively
and receptively be experienced as I explained
above. This extra dimension so complicates
the matter of keeping balance, so that one,
counting with several factors, easily loses
sight of their coherence. Mentally one can be
receptive and active and emotionally one can
be receptive and active. For the quality of
higher thought you therefore must as well
read as write and as well listen to someone
as speak to someone, if you want to keep
balance. It is like with the computer:
uploading and downloading (or broadcasting
and watching t.v.) or also as a kind of
digestion like one has with breathing in and
out or with drinking and eating and then
frequenting the toilet. And emotionally
operates the reciprocity command just the
same: you must as well listen to music as go
sing yourself or control a musical
instrument, you must as well appreciate
another's artistic accomplishments as go and
dance or compose or paint yourself. Not being
successful in keeping balance with this
second dimension, will give rise to problems
that manifest as a conflict between your
feeling and your thinking self. Being too
active in your mind you may expect eruptions
of your emotional nature, as you can have in
a nasty dream e.g. or, being stuck in lies
and excuses, you can have in a fight with an
'hour of truth' or with an emotional burnout;
and the other way around, when you delve too
deep and long in emotions, can that give rise
to mental confusion and compromise your
integrity and even lead to your getting
entangled in doing things you never actually
thought of doing - as if you're drunk or when
you can't be yourself - because you
insufficiently count with the factual and too
much act on your impulses, nor weigh your
arguments properly then. So is it, with the
fourfold division we discussed the other
minute, wise, for this extra dimension of
being physically/emotionally and mentally
engaged, to further divide your day. And so
you may picture yourself a fourfold division
of as well your active as your receptive
period: receptive/reactive and actively of
initiative for six hours reserved for
yourself to the nature, six hours for
your body to the form, six hours for
the spirit to the person and six for
the others being to the doer, is
following your day filled with in principle
three hours reserved for each of the thus
formed parts. To fight the confusion of the
mixing up of these things you for a moment so
have to contemplate the basic notion of your
life. The basic logic concerning the
passive/reactive and actively being of
initiative of your life, is that you to
the nature, respect the form of the person as
the doer. The being receptive/reactive
resorts under the nature and form
(dharma and rûpa in
yoga), as the cause of your actions and the
being active resorts under the person - the
self of logic and reason - and the doer - the
self subject to, but being of initiative
with, the time and your fellow man
(kâla and purusha, see
also info.html
about
causality).
Thus you arrive at eight periods of three
hours for the day with which you then may set
up your calendar. To the ideal takes such a
timetable consequently the following
form:

What
is the argument behind that
table?
You
are, receptive/reactive living to the
nature, mentally engaged with
meditations and to the form in this respect
busy with dreams in your sleep. Next to that
must you being more physically reactive to
your own nature, do your hobbies to
counterbalance your obligations and with that
also in reaction to the needs of the form of
the body again take care of your own matter
in doing your household duties.
Being
active on the mental plane, you take as a
person, as a being of reason and
logic, up a study or are you at the other
hand stimulated by the time as the
doer, mentally then engaged for God,
as one says or pro deo, laboring on a
voluntary basis. Next to that you must, being
more physically motivated, show initiative to
entertain personal relations and must you
positively as a more materially motivated
doer be committed to delivering service for
the sake of others to make a living or
deserve your bread as one could
say.
What
you, less ideal reasoning from the way things
fare, may say is that you, globally being of
balance with this vision, living normally
like an adult on working days, in reaction,
then sleep for six hours to meditate on your
dreams, and six hours for the fine order keep
yourselves occupied with household chores,
eating and your hobbies, to which the
conscious meditating and contemplating are
easily neglected. Actively engaged on normal
working days you physically deal with other
people and do you do your job, with six hours
left for being spiritually motivated to
engage yourselves in a more voluntary way
with others and for the purpose of studying,
with the help of books, t.v., the computer
and other media. Also concerning this, one
tends to work more than one socializes and
watch more t.v. and/or use the computer than
busy yourselves with voluntary labor. Because
you thus factually reserve too little time
for studying, charitable work, and
socializing in this modern society tending to
materialism all the time, must, for the
balance of a good life, for that purpose days
of compensation be intersected in your
calendar to account for the damage; days thus
of study, socializing and a selflessly
motivated contemplation, that factually, from
the logic of the balance, constitute a real
necessity and, with you being conscious to
it, even are a real need in your life. But
more about that in the next dialogue about
value-control.
The
blocks of three hours do not necessarily have
to follow in a tight order of time. They are
but a general measure of balance with which
you can move back and forwards in finding
your own daily schedule. Thus you meditate
during the day regularly for some time to
have a quality moment of peace and are you in
the evening mentally occupied with the media
- especially the t.v. most of the people. It
is thus not so that you'd be strictly active
during the day and completely passive or that
homely during the later hours or at night.
What
is of interest, is to realize that a balanced
schedule for the day during a working week of
six days of work, gives you 6 x 6= 36 hours
of work. A forty hour working week of five
days of eight hours, can be done, but shifts
the emphasis concerning the being active,
this way seen, more to the physical plane
with you having to face the reactions to
that. The propensity to imbalanced action
concerning your orientation in time and space
that is built into our society, manifests
itself in this following as a lateral
disturbance, between the right and the left
side of your brain. The lateral constitutes
the third dimension in the operation of the
brain we have to consider.
How
does one control the lateral the way it
should? One has to serve the time system and
you're neither always in control of the space
you have.
Indeed
constitutes the time system a maddening
barrier between you and the natural world we
live in, which calls for a conscious
approach. For this purpose you must train the
body to be independent of the cultural
time-system and thus manage to save your
lateral integrity. Materialistic society has
separated the time from the place and
estranges you easily from yourself and from
others by diverting you with a mind directed
elsewhere. The clock which, missing a
cogwheel to account for the tempo of the
passing sun, in fact is outdated, ran amok
and now carries wheels, wings, a screen, a
keyboard, loudspeakers, and a microphone, and
grew so into a system in which you never know
where you are with your mind. This breaking
with the place or this dislocation of your
time consciousness is a characteristic of
individual mental illness or at least of a
commonly shared cultural neurosis. Even the
spirit of the timeless self and wisdom of
eternity that we in meditations share in the
knowledge of the soul, demands a correct
orientation to time and circumstance: the
consciousness of the moment. Psychiatrists
always check the sense of time and place of
patients which is typically disturbed with
them. The cure consists of offering people
settled daily activities, to offer them
'structure' as it is called, with a tight
schedule of work, to restore their
orientation to the time and place. But before
it went that for you, can you avert the
danger of a split mind directed at a time
separated from the place, by three times a
day engaging in yoga-exercises with the help
of mantras for the sake of the expression of
your emotions: in the early morning before
breakfast, in the evening before dinner and
at night before you go asleep, so that you
purify yourself for the different activities
of the day and are able to delimit them. Do
âsanas like the
sûrya-namskâr, the
greeting of the sungod, and do the
pranava,
by nasally vibrating AUM ten times,
concluding the exercise with the
gâyatrî
mantra to reset your brain to respectively
the primordial sound of God that unites all
other sounds in the ether and to the original
order of the nature of the sun. The
filognostic builds on the existence of the
ether and thus sounds a version of the vedic
three-foot-mantra, the
gâyatrî, like this:
'Aum...,
earth, the ether, heaven;
that vitality we pray for;
the grace of God for everyone;
the mind pure in harmony.'
The
gâyatrî-mantra itself is
more specifically directed at the divinity
and the order of the sun, but since we
respect the sun already with a
tempometer,
applies this version more generally to the
entire order of time for reconciliation with
God and oneself. Of course should you for
that purpose, to do it without a computer,
set
a clock for meditation to the
sun,
because the social times turned against
nature and that ether will lead to the
forgetfulness of not respecting that nature
essential to your soul as its ground of
being. Also of importance is it to find a
quiet and sanctified place to do your
exercises. This is not always as easy. In
case of being disoriented and disturbed
beyond your control, can you force the spirit
and the body into obedience with the help of
the so-called mahâmantra,
defended by the factually not that sectarian,
but indeed very traditional Hare Krishnas,
that mediates the controllers of the vedic
philosophy of Lord Krishna and Lord
Râma. Also other bhajans to the
honor of the holy name and their respective
cultures of knowledge are effective. With the
holy names you also find the true meaning of
your being incarnated, of being René,
of having begun a new life in relation to
Hari, the Fortunate One, the Lord or the
Supreme Personality of Godhead: He, the field
in all fields, is the one who time and again
is present to put things right so that you
never stand alone in this. It is with Him
that you have to manage to cooperate in each
life. He is the one to say I to the
impersonal as the greatest sacrifice
possible, so that nothing is impersonal
anymore. A good scientist knows that all is
claimed after so many ages of civilization -
even the mistakes - and that reference is a
basic duty of validation, of declaring
something valid.
The
musical exercises in this department of
emotional control must, as I told you
earlier, however authentic they are, always
be directed at towards the solution of the
soul and its agents, because directed at the
worldly you will get entangled as a
stimulus-response junkie and fall from your
discipline. Be in the world, not of the
world.
So
remembering and working for my integrity with
yoga restores the lateral balance lost in
materialistic, cultural
engagement?
Yes,
provided you watch the time carefully thus.
On top of that is the yoga also conducive for
the control of the so-called small brain, the
cerebellum in the lower back of your brain,
that regulates the physical control you have
over your body. It is good to train that
center to be independent of the storms that
might go on in the emotional and cortical
centers. The consciousness that is stable is
that of the times set to the signals of
nature; that of culture depends on
politicians, bosses and intimates that are
materially motivated and thus may burn down;
the materialistically motivated consciousness
is not stable. So you can materialistically
either forget your discipline of integrity
and emotional expression messing it up with
nature yourself, or you can be messed up by
others disturbing in that relation. And you
must count also with the third disturbance
that is there from the modes of nature like
summer and winter, natural calamities like
floods and earth quakes, and general changes
in the weather. The purpose of yoga in
general is to be independent of these modes
in the stability of one's consciousness and
physical control, even though - or rather
because - they exert great influence. So
don't sleep too little during the summer nor
too much during the winter time. Sometimes
you rise in the dark, sometimes in the light
living on the latitudes at a greater distance
from the equator. It must not be so that your
yoga is lost if you change the clime or when
the seasons change on you.
Is
filognosy a type of yoga?
Yes
and no. The yoga you know as a physical
exercise of meditation and postures is but a
part of it, so you may say so. You may call
it filognostic yoga or Aadhar yoga, the
syncretic yoga of your basic interests of
mental, societal and physical well-being. But
not being turned away from society doing a
normal job and being engaged in activities
directed at the person with it you may call
it just gnosis: spiritual knowing embedded
between, and connecting, the interests of the
impersonal of science, the argumentation and
facts at the one hand and the personal of
religion and politics at the other hand. It
is a syncretic approach of different
overlapping domains of knowledge that covers
the most important visions of life. You may
also call it a vedic concept of reform or the
cultural restoration of classical values and
actions. We only incidentally, though
regular, turn away from the world in an
exercise of yoga to counterbalance and
restore the lateral functions, but we do not
turn away from the world at other times or
the other fields of action. So in general we
are filognostics and incidentally we are
yogîs in the strict sense. We promote
the wholeness of life, not any isolated
exercise that then would constitute escapism.
Of yoga we scripturally know the yoga of work
(karma), of thought
(jñâna) and of devotional
service (upâsana), so we say
work and pray, but also love the knowledge.
Then you have the yoga complete as a
filognostic, as an
âdhara-yogî, a yogî
covering all the fundamental
interests.
You
say we, are you not alone as an independent
authority?
No,
the enlightenment of working with an
adaptation to ones own reckoning, and the
being liberated in the service of and
attention for the traditional is combined, as
you realize from my advise to you to do
yoga-exercises. But with this we shall be
more extensively engaged in the
identity-control dialogue of section
5.
So
to sum up this conversation: we stay healthy
by balancing not just the fields of action
for a week, but also the three dimensions of
the brain functioning during the day in
respect of one's initiative/receptivity,
emotionality/rationality and one's time/space
laterality?
Yes
right you are René, you've understood
the kernel of the analytic discipline of
discriminating between the interest of the
body and the soul, in relation to the
individual and the social, the concrete and
the abstract of the fields of
action.
Is
there much more about this or
not?
This
sums it up nicely as far as your expression
in the material world is concerned, but there
is a whole culture behind it dealing with
much more, with a type of Bible called
the
Bhâgavata
Purâna
or the Story of the Fortunate One. For
the sake of filognosy assumes that devotion
analytically and lyrically adapted to our
culture and our notion of God, a somewhat
different form. Sanskrit names and words are
a concept in India, but over elsewhere
strange to the people. We thus have to,
vedically reformed adapted to time and
circumstance, form our own english
understanding of the matter. The original
hymn in Sanskriet stays therewhith as a 'mass
in latin', as an option to the more
traditionally advanced ones and the monks.
This transformation, this filognostical
bridge built to reach out to the classical
culture, expresses itself e.g. in a version
of the so-called 'Great verses' (in stead of
the sacred, and thus factually not
translatable mahâmantra)
in which one then sings:
With
the Ether, with the Time,
with each other, free sublime
Sing together, listen, partake
talking, down town, working,
awake.
proper
weighing, non-illusion,
getting art, above confusion,
know the Best One, free expression,
all the six, is my
confession.
Or an
'In the name of...' in stead of the
so-called pranâti
which
stands for a tribute to the spiritual master:
In
the name of Graces' Keeping,
all the Love of Happiness,
did the past defeat the sleeping,
for 'I' and 'mine' is no progress.
Love of
Truth, pure, share and helping;
the values of the godliness,
impersonal no, not estranged,
are we the soul with the
fearless.
Thus can,
for the sake of our emotional expression and
togetherness as sung in association, the
filognostic devotion which is of a vedic
origin, still very much in English appear in
a form of piety that to our culture is a
correct, understandable and recognizable
notion of the Person of God. In dialogue
number five we will further expound on this
in fact also importantly identity-conscious
matter.
Dialogue
four: II-b Value control
René,
for the stability of your consciousness you
have to associate and in order to keep that
association you have to be united. Thus is
yoga, or the science of uniting the
consciousness, essential to your happiness.
The issue of time and th ether is also
important here thus: you have to keep
yourself with the control of forces in your
yoga on the calendar.
You
call it value control, isn't yoga more a
matter of self-control?
The
self of the body and the self of the
principles are not the same. The self of the
principles we call soul is what we have in
common, it doesn't die when the body dies.
Therefore is that master of the value
control. Your individual style of relating to
it is your individual soul that is remembered
when the body has deceased. In the previous
dialogues you learned about the method, the
facts and the analysis of the time-factor
involved so that you can plan your actions,
have a full life, but still keep the balance.
But it is only your time of life if you
manage to stay united in the ether,
associated and endure with it in
fortitude.
What
do I have to endure?
Apart from
simply holding on to the discipline, you have
to bear with the operating modes of matter
exerting their influence from the outside.
There are three modes in nature that might
bewilder you, they constitute the illusory
effect of the material universe. It is the
ignorant, the passionate and the good. Your
stability with them is what counts.
Detachment is the way to the soul. The
detachment is remembered in four basic
principles of conduct that make up the nature
of the continence of the soul. With these
regulative principles you can contain
yourself, irrespective what happens in the
universe or what others say and do. The idea
is that the eternal self of the original soul
cannot be lost, you only need to follow its
principles to keep to it.
Modes
and principles, the bad and the
good?
No.
Modes are not bad, the modes are natural and
the principles too. But one is needed to cope
with the other. The modes of passion,
associated with movement; the mode of
goodness associated with knowledge and the
mode of ignorance associated with slowness
challenge you as the soul to keep to the
principles that assure your transcendence and
stability.The Hindus recognize in them their
gods S'iva (ignorance), Brahmâ
(passion) and Vishnu (goodness).
I
attain to objectivity as it
where?
You
could say that, but the look is more turned
inward than outward. You better watch your
happiness, the soul is the firm basis of
knowledge and the seat of consciousness and
happiness. So in the exercises you always
turn inwards away from the operating modes to
retrieve, consolidate and remember your
happiness. It is your moment of filognostic
prayer wherein the mind finds its basis. Let
the movement of your body be for what it is,
you are the witness now and not the one, the
false ego, identified. Let the goodness also
be for what it is then, it shouldn't so much
depend on actions but more inspire actions,
it is as the good Lord in heaven, present in
the beyond, but also possibly manifest before
you as a defense of the soul it's interest.
Let the ignorant be for what it is, do not
manipulate matter any longer, dare to be
fruitless for some time. Thus you meditate
three times a day beginning as said with the
common postures and the pranava,
saying AUM ten times.
So
what about these principles, how do they
assure stability?
The
principles are that of truth, of purity, of
detachment and of compassion. The vedic word
states they is are the four legs of the bull
standing for what the Indians call
dharma, religion or naturalness or right
conduct; they are respectively: satya,
s'auca, tapas, and dayâ. These are
your basic commandments. Not the usual ten
commandments thus, but just these four will
do for starters; these are the basic ones.
The first principle of truth, satya,
is a matter of respecting the facts of the
creation as they are. Non-illusion is the
purpose of the science and in that context we
already discussed the issue of the time you
need to be in control with yourself. It also
implies that you do not flee from the truth
in taking to alcohol, drugs or other
intoxicants. Even caffeine coffee and black
tea, brown chocolate and soft-drinks
containing stimulants should be checked. You
have to see things as they are, not have any
artificial stuff manipulate you into a fake
happiness. Let your bliss be real. It is also
wise to read the scriptures regularly like
listening to the Bhagavad
Gîtâ each morning before you
do your job. Do follow the lead of the
classical truths of wisdom. Lasting they
proved to be eternal. The absolute and
lasting eternal truth of the reality that you
can't change, of souls, the material
elements, the ether and the time, outweighs
the relative truths of the cloud of thoughts
to the matters and forms that depend on your
control. Thus we already arrived at the
respect for the natural order as the way of
transcending the times of fruitive labor that
were conjured up by man. The ancient wisdom
is all based on that natural
order.
So
what does purity actually
mean?
The
second rule is that of purity, s'auca.
It usually means the acceptance of sexual
frustration or celibacy, whether you're
married or not; but it is also synonymous
with dâna: sharing,
communicating and donating. Sexual
frustration is a normal thing, not just for
human beings. Animals grow horns and bushes
of feathers with it and human beings develop
culture with it. But don't get me wrong, sex
is not bad. You simply have to keep that dog
and apelike body on the leash. First of all
you are a human being or individual soul in
respect of the Supersoul of God above that is
above all that, that is the purity to share.
But purity is more than celibacy and sharing.
It also means that you keep the mind focussed
with the mantras we mentioned. Beware of the
ulterior motive. Lust inspires too and
distracts the mind. Lust requires regulation,
denial doesn't really help. Sex is good if
you are in love and want to let nature take
its course. That's how we get children. But
as a habit, a compulsion, a kind of fun, and
a mechanical thing you should deny it; it is
not really the sharing anymore, it is selfish
and destructive then. Do not spoil the
natural with such a dirty mind or stone of
attachment in your heart. And finally purity
also means cleanliness of course. mental as
well as physical. Not just no dirty and
distracted mind of desire, but also always
washing the dishes, having clean underwear
every day, taking a shower each morning,
washing after defecating, washing before
going asleep, brushing your teeth three times
a day thoroughly and doing the laundry
regularly as well as household chores. Thus
is s'auca also all the cleanliness.
The mental and physical purity, sharing and
all, is your loyalty or else you are
unfaithful in betrayal and fall-down. Believe
in it.
Penance
is difficult. How to do it and why should I
limit myself anyhow, doesn't nature rule
us?
The
third principle is that of penance,
tapas. There is voluntary penance and
enforced penance. Better not wait for God or
fate to impose the penance upon you. With
everything you do you must know to stop; even
with the stopping you have to stop, like it
is with the duty to get out of bed at night
to urinate. Not being able to stop factually
means not being able to engage properly also.
That's how the car works that your body is.
This drivers license of penance is what you
need, so to speak. That is the control you
need with th ether and thus we have the need
of the order of time again. So for your
eating, there is fasting: every night you do
so and you also fast every fifteenth day on
the cakra-calendar so that you don't fast on
a day of socialization (going out, doing the
field of the false ego, when you have to show
your face), which, formally, is the seventh
and the fourteenth cakra-day or a 15-day
period of two weeks of labor consisting of
six days of work. Fasting is best done by not
eating at all, just drinking water, milk or
fruit juice. The body so to speak. has to be
switched to the reserve-position so now and
then. In order to stay healthy you have to
flip that switch regularly with a good
schedule. Overeating is one of the great
problems of modern society. People consume,
with a false, conditioned cry of hunger, but
do, with the ether, not have it under control
just like that. They develop all kind of
diseases because they forgot to switch on
reserve. You also eat leftovers in the fridge
don't you? This is the same. Clean the
fridge, eat from your reserve of fat and so
for a day. Further does penance also apply to
actions, especially fruitive labor. On cakra
sundays of socializing, on lunar signal-days
of study and/or religious celebration and on
solar leap-days (the fifteenth cakra-day and
the two-monthly extra day to leap the cakra
month) you shouldn't engage in any productive
or fruitive labor. But remember,
self-correction activities are of all days,
just like your parent had to correct you
every day. And also be careful not to torment
the body with fasting too long, not sleeping
enough or other forms of self-denial. It is
all a matter of regulation in such a manner
that is pleasant and natural to you. Normal
eating is also restricted to the times set
for it. With proper regulation you don't tire
yourself and thus you don't have to sleep
that much. A mother not caring properly for
her child gets a nagging child that wears her
out. So considering what we above called
proper in filognostically not wasting your
life on ulterior motives, always try to
follow the natural order in
this:
the lunar and solar
days
and the
clock set to the
sun;
the authority of nature is the proper one,
the dharmic one, the rest is compensation of
a lesser quality. Failing in this more
conscientious self-regulation you will sooner
or later have to pay the price of an enforced
penance. You'll get sick or otherwise be
plagued by your psyche or by turns of fate.
E.g. during a war you can recognize what
happens as an enforced penance: the fun of
consuming is over, everything is rationed
then, or, in other words, the penance of
sharing must be imposed. Penance is, not
taking more than one needs, thus also
sharing. So stay ahead of fate, make it your
free will of wisdom. You know better.
Other necessary penances
are fasting of dairy for a month (May e.g.)
and refraining from the tube, from t.v., for
at least one day a week in order to
decondition from that dictatorial defiance of
the local principle. The greek Ulysses also
had to stick to the sheep (the local
community) to escape the cyclops (the t.v.)
that held him captive. That, conditioned as
you are, might not be easy without an
alternative calendar and clock; the system
tends to eat you up and allow you nothing
outside of it. You need a system to defeat a
system, to defy a system.
The
last principle is that of compassion.. should
I in yoga love my fellow man or
what?
Certainly
a good yogî is a compassionate man. He
recognizes his self-interest in that of
others and suffers when others suffer. So he
helps. That is compassion, dayâ.
I must be stupid to enjoy another man's
suffering. Don't wish or accept for others
what you don't want for yourself. The law of
karma is that of action and reaction. All
will return to you. You end up in the world
you've built yourself. So they say: aim for
heaven and a better world. But of course it
is this world, but then done better. The
better is containing the good of the
foregoing in non-repression; what's a tree
without its roots? Compassion is the
peace-principle, that is how the human cause
is doing justice. Compassion is the
nonviolence principle. Meaningless self
destruction is the killer of all faith.
Unnecessary violence should at all cost be
prevented. It is bad enough to be of
necessary violence, defending yourself, with
the weapon of your enemy. The
Gîtâ, wherein Lord Krishna
summons his friend Arjuna to take up his arms
and fight says it this way: 'blessed
are those who see it coming, to them the
kingdom of
heaven.'
Also important is to be of charity: give the
ones needy what they ache for: food, shelter,
clothing, security and other basic
necessities. See to it that no one has to
complain. So this principle naturally follows
the previous one. Without sharing and helping
human society is not human at all, but
heading for self-destruction. The four
principles as mentioned define the humanity,
not so much the animality that is the
weaknesses with them, that deceives, kills,
is promiscuous and steals. Last but not least
there is the compassion with other creatures.
Also with them be nonviolent. It is not
necessary to kill animals for food. The joy
of life you grant them will be yours if you
let them live their full life. You don't kill
your mother if she doesn't feed you any more
do you? So why kill mother cow then when
she's too old to give any milk, isn't that
immoral? Also let other animals live. Share
in the joy of life, not so much in the lust
for life, that is the way of God. Avoid
unnecessary violence. Again I say beyond
necessity you're a fool falling down in hell
step by step.
So
how should I be a good vegetarian? Just
eating beans in stead of flesh makes me
hungry. That can't be right, is it? That
would weaken me!
Right
you are. But the strength you seek not the
strength of the unnecessary violence that
meat-eaters cherish against animals. What one
seeks as a man is more the defensive strength
of elephants and cattle, than the offensive
strength of the violent tiger and wolf. The
vegetarian diet requires a bit more effort
from your side to stay healthy. But the
resulting joy of life is certainly worth the
trouble. So take care of your proteins, fatty
acids, vitamins and minerals like iron. For
your proteins eat beans combined with grains.
They are so-called complementary proteins.
They together provide you all the building
blocks for your own bodily protein synthesis.
Meat is like a vitamin pill: you have
everything in one bite. That is nice, and
tastes good too, but breaking down complex
proteins into the constituent elements needed
for your own protein synthesis gives toxic
waste in the intestines that do damage to
your digestive system and are, according some
researchers, conducive to diseases like
cancer of the stomach and colon, certainly in
case of burnt and smoked meat. Meat-eaters
like cats and dogs have short intestines. But
you as a primate with limited talents in
this, don't; you have long intestines. You
poison yourself with meat-eating and
therefore the doctor always says: you should
train, move the body, run into sweat, just to
stimulate the digestion. And so is much of
the meat-eaters culture there just for
digestive purposes: just to make shit. The
meat-eater literally turns sour by the
necessity of a stronger stomach acid. And
acid saliva is not good for your dental
health also. So also for these reasons of
living peaceful and comfortably, be a
vegetarian. The planet can sustain not that
many meat-eaters either, So forget about it,
there is no future in it. For your fatty
acids, good for your cartilage e.g., you must
eat a cheese sandwich each day or a table
spoon of linseed oil, or else you have to
take take fish oil supplements which are not
vegetarian. The proteins are, with beans and
grains combined, no problem; you even must
take care not to satisfy the body too much
eating all proteins in one meal, unless you
have a feast, or in need of something extra.
Eat bread or cereal at breakfast, but not
always rice or pasta at your dinner. Eat
potatoes instead, if you're not too fat. Just
take (preferably biological) beans or other
pulses with your potatoes and vegetables in
replacing the meat-dish. Then the body will
stay eager to serve to get it's necessary
complementary cookie at tea or sandwich some
time later in the day. Eat little but
regularly; but indulge yourself also now and
then, e.g. on a cakra day of socialization.
Drink herbal tea. That together keeps the
spirit and the body as well eager as
satisfied. For your vitamins you must take
care to eat three pieces of fruit each day as
well as half a plate of fresh vegetables. The
vitamin C is absolutely necessary. You will
suffer depressions and fall ill if you don't
eat them. For your iron, an element also
easily available in meat-dishes, you must eat
iron-rich vegetables and fruits, like
broccoli, chicory and figs not to get anemia.
For your b12 vitamin - the vitamin that makes
you hungry missing it - you must eat dairy
products (you can do without B12 for the
maximum of a month ). It is a vitamin needed
for your nervous system. So two glasses of
milk a day or else, if you have a lactose
allergy (think of the milkfast!), a few
pieces of cheese covering the same amount
will do. Cheese is compressed and fermented
milk missing its water. It is safe for people
with the allergy. Veganists are condemned to
eat seaweed instead of dairy. Such a diet is
more troublesome. Don't be a fanatic, or else
it is a lack of philosophy. The cow is your
welfare and well-being, and in a vegetarian
culture she is thus holy. Nuts are also a
source of vitamin B, selenium (brazil nuts),
fatty acids and protein. Use, sparingly, real
butter and no margarine on your bread, for
the artificial vitamin D in it can
give you serious trouble. An exess of it
results, unlike with natural vitamin D, in
calcium deposits throughout the body
(hypercalcemia).
Also problems may result with e.g. ones
nerves and joints. Vitamin D is associated
with the immune system which, unsettled with
a wrong type of D, may lead to chronic
inflammation disorders like M.
S.
and arthritis.
So the lesson is: eat natural, not too much,
not all at the same time, and eat variegated;
then you'll live longer and happier than many
a meat-eater and will you be without all the
sweat (and the extra medical cost and misery)
about staying healthy.
So
now I'm done transcending the modes with the
principles?
Provided
you do your daily exercises, yes, for
starters. Of course is the path inwards a
complete selfrealization process concerned
with diverse matters of enlightenment and
liberation, not just sitting five to twenty
minutes for meditation with a vegetarian
meal. Your whole life will be transformed
becoming a more transcendent person better in
control with yourself. You will realize that
you'll develop a certain capacity of
abstraction which opens higher levels of
operating with your identity of service. But
remember that rising up to the abstract must
never lead to escapism. Stay connected in the
concrete managing the balancing in the fields
of action we discussed.
So
there are levels of
attainment?
It
are more different types of commitment. Each
soul has his own mix of concrete and abstract
talents in this. The higher abstract of it is
not necessarily holier or better than the
more concrete. It is highly personal the way
one plays this game of order. This makes the
human identity effective that is just, that
is not a false imagined and haughty fixed
ego, but an ego in line with the dictates of
this absolute of the human and divine truth
of identities at different levels with
different degrees of experience and styles of
progress. We will discuss that more
elaborately in our next conversation. For the
time it is enough that you realize that yoga
is not just a few exercises but a complete
filognostic reality of having different
visions of spiritual knowing that cover your
whole life. That fullness of life is what
filognosy aims at, that's what makes the yoga
real. As I said is yoga itself in the narrow
sense thus but one of the six visions of
filognosy. The matter of finding absorption
in anga's, levels or limbs of yoga,
that in reality are more realms that overlap,
is just this dialogue actually, the previous
one was more analytically concerned with the
dual nature of the philosophy of yoga, and
the rest before that and that follows now is
more a matter of science and respect for the
person.
But
what are these levels or limbs of
transcendence?
Like
in yoga first respecting the don'ts of the
vow to follow these principles and following
the do's of regulating the activities as
discussed, after which you sit in postures to
regulate your breath, turn inward and
concentrate with a mantra to meditate and
find absorption and stability in the self, is
also your whole life in filognosy a process
similar to such an individual exercise. And
please do not think too linear about the
following enumeration.
-
1) Yama-level: At first you may be
pretty physical being young and eager to
build a life, attracting others and
showing off. The beginners level is
wrestling with the vow of yoga to be pure
in this being nonviolently, truthfully,
non-possessive and not stealing of penance
in celibacy, even in marriage.
- 2)
Niyama-level: At the next level or
field of respect in transcendence, you
wrestle with the order of a regular
practice. You should study, be clean,
serve the cause, sacrifice, be hospitable,
be content, be charitable, be faithful and
be of attendance. This takes some time to
settle in your life balancing to the order
of time. It is like a sport you practice
to integrate your actions. Difficult in
the beginning, but sweet on the long
run.
- 3)
Âsana-level: At the next
interest of transcendence you learn to
develop the right attitude of service in
control of the body. Experimenting in
competition, competing with the weaker
approach of your previous life, you have
to learn to cooperate, to cooperate to the
general directives of the classical
science of wisdom. Next to the poise of
meditation to control the physical energy,
it is the poise of life in general also
that you develop being a good sport in
command of the dog that is your body. It
is not as easy to master yourself as it
seems. It requires the vow and exercise of
the level before this one. You have to
practice the austerity, develop the
attitude and thus be in
control.
- 4)
Prânâyâma-level:
The level following you learn to use your
breath to concentrate. In the reality of
life this usually is the breath you
practice controlling your speech. You have
to say the right thing to find intimacy
with others, get married and be a reliable
partner in control with himself. So there
you are again; in order to build and keep
relations, you need the vow, the
regulation and the control over the body
as a precondition. Now at this level, in
this field of yogic interest, we get above
the waist so to say, from the private
going public and do we morally directed
with the b ody under control build a
formal society of accountable and faithful
people.
- 5)
Pratyâhâra-level: Next
level is the level where you turn inward.
You can't fix yourself on the diversity of
the outside word only and stay
concentrated, stay focussed on the cause
of a happy life for all. Now you have to
develop meaning in your relations. You
have to concentrate on that and be
responsible, accountable, trustworthy, as
a beacon of clarity to be a meaningful
other. One might think yoga is a selfish
practice of turning turning inward, but
filognostically you realize that you
cannot develop any quality without the
meaning of the soul being the reality of
values and God that you share with others.
Even the strictest yogî trying to
meditate in the forest for enlightenment
has to build a life relating to his
environment in such a manner, that a
certain quality is achieved that is love
and peace for all of life outside and
inside of him. The meditator cannot
separate himself from life. He is life and
sees it equally everywhere around him,
that vision of the soul is the
concentration on the inner reality that is
needed. In fact one gets more real being
deeper making sense with other living
beings, not more distant being an escapist
and stranger on the run for social
responsibilities. 'Let
this yoga not go at the cost of prescribed
duties'
writes sage Vyâsa in the
Gîtâ. So one
concentrates on the soul in keeping in
touch with others by appointments to the
original order of time and thus you make
life meaningful, thus you make a
difference. This level is crucial, here
one cares, settles and loves as the
filognostic, as the person of
comprehension, with a heart that you have
to be alive with being real with the
yoga.
- 6)
Dhâranâ-level: Further
transcending in emancipation knowledge
starts to count. To have a more closely
defined agreement with yourself and others
to assert yourselves, discuss and
contemplate, is crucial for the society
you're part of and have to learn to take
responsibility for. This is the actual
concentration that makes your person and
life. Taken strictly individual it is the
practice of mantras, succinct sayings of
your wisdom and experience. But with
others together in agreement being of
service to the filognostic cause and
modeling that for others you have to
concentrate on everything conducive to the
humanity and the justice for all living
beings and the whole planet. That is the
enlightened self-interest thereof for
which you must assert yourselves in
discussions and learn to contemplate
matters in focus.
- 7)
Dhyâna-level: After this follows
the meditation in which one arrives at
understanding, at know-how. Now it is
serious business, a science of acting
without acting; of directing without
directing. You learned to have a heart and
be a model. Now, in order to be a quiet
witness, you have to investigate and doubt
what would be contrary to the cause. Now
the concentration is in function. Once
having realized this more detached
position of being more of a quiet witness,
you attain to the next level.
- 8)
Samâdhi-level: What follows
as a consequence of the vow, the
regulation, the exercise, the practice,
the relations, the heart, the assertion,
and the understanding, is the absorption
of selfrealization wherein the unwanted
finds destruction, the wanted is created
and the culture reaches it's celebration
in maintenance. As a seer finding
stability in the moment of the here and
now with the ether in this position of
transcendence, constitutes the practice of
being a full human being in everyday life
in respect of the fields being balanced
with the principles. It is not to be
renown as such; one may very well in the
background with the traditional lordships
of creation, destruction and maintenance
be ruling the business of the wisdom and
transcendence. In this last stage is what
matters the stability of your being
absorbed in the blissful, the durable and
the conscious of one's being connected in
the yoga.
You
may go from low to high, from the ethereal to
the material, with these levels or areas of
interest of the eight-fold yoga in your life
climbing to heaven, but equally you may
descend to be of concrete actions and
presence this way. This ability to go up as
well as going down is the (aroha/avaroha)
quality of having matured in filognosy, of
having that love for the knowledge that you
and the rest of this world need to survive,
be motivated and rejoice.
Emancipation
so is then the transcendental unification
with disipline?
Emancipation
is the evolution of devotion in one's
relating to enlighten-ment. This consists of
nine activities which are the result of the
combination of the three different forms of
uniting one's consciousness (in knowledge, in
work and in voluntary service) and the three
disciplines (of the impersonal - the ether -,
the local - the material, and the personal -
one's time-order).
Vedically
is this process of becoming called
bhâgavata dharma and is it
somewhat differently described.
Okay,
and thank you Aadhar for this
elucidation.
Dialogue
five III-a Identity control
In
the next section we come to realize what it
means to become a person, to develop an
identity. The concept of the person is
crucial for you to be happy. Estranged one
feels neglected as a person and tends one to
become destructive to fight that bad feeling
off. The idea here is that with proper
respect for the impersonal of the previous
sections, for all the arguments, facts and
rules and principles, you achieve the person,
the original person, as a result. You learn
to discriminate between the different
dimensions of the game of order that we're
playing in this world.
Aadhar,
the human identity, what is it all
about?
Dear
René, in
the process of becoming a person, of
developing an identity in selfrealization,
are all members of society involved. The one
better than he was, the one who progressed,
has respected the principles of progress: the
rules and the facts of the absolute truth,
the truth of God who is independent of you
and who is of all qualities that we call
better; the less the feeling of estrangement
and the tendency to be destructive therein
becomes, the more you as a person will feel
respected and also will be of respect for
others. By birth, by nature, and by culture
you develop a certain preference for a
certain type of service. Some want to be a
friend or comrade helping others out, some
want to manage and have a business of their
own, some want to regulate and control the
legal system as public servants of some kind
and some want to study, develop and teach in
science and religion. These four are the
basic vocations one can have, feeling called
for service in the society. One's identity
though is more complex than the with this
orientation belonging to a certain class of
people (the varna). Also age counts
and makes for a separate spiritual department
we call the status (the
âs'rama). One is first of all a
youngster, a celibate student usually under
the control of adults, parents and teachers
in school. After school one chooses a
profession and marries, and is the status of
young-adult achieved. One builds a family,
begets children and educates them, and many
consider this to be the essence of life. But
there is more to it. After roughly twenty
years of this family business the children
have grown up and middle age sets in. For
bachelors that never married it is likewise:
around their fortieth must also they have
arrived, must they know for which they stand
in life, must they face the maturity of their
own commitment, of what they have brought
about in the society. The married couple not
bound by anything else but the sexual accord
for begetting and raising children might find
themselves in a divorce, for the contract of
procreation is finished then. But that
doesn't have to be so. One may withdraw
together bound by filognosy, the love for the
spiritual knowledge of the soul with or
without a specific religion, that keeps one
together in service. The middle aged are
supposed to accompany the young adults and
transmit their experience. The tradition
should be handed down and the position taken
should be transferred to the next generation.
A neglected middle-age culture of people
attached to the life of young adults gives a
generation conflict since the progress in
society is blocked that way. The middle age
is the age of assuming responsibility for the
society as a whole. It depends more on
knowledge and culture than on family
relations and attachments. Next growing older
one becomes an elder detached enough to
represent the classical wisdom that the
middle-aged aren't that all clear about right
away, with their still half being entangled
in material matters; but they are returning
to it. The elders are responsible to remind
them of the classical value of the insights
won in one's own life and by the ancestors,
ages and philosophers of old that did the
same and that is more a matter of traditions
than of ego. So we have the basic identity of
man in sixteen possible status-orientation
groups: the four for the status of a certain
age-group combined with the four for the
vocation of a certain commitment of
service.
Are
they the same as the indian
castes?
More
or less, you may call it caste, but they are
universal categories for all societies of
people. The normal employee is the comrade
and the friend that consecutively makes the
career-moves of being an acquaintance, of
becoming a partner, of next becoming a
companion in life and finally complete
his/her life in being an elder, or a senior,
in retirement. For the entrepreneur of the
department of provision develops life, in the
ideal sense, itself from being an assistant
in training to a manager's job with
responsibility, to assume following middle
aged the lead as one's own boss or CEO, so
that one finally after transferring the
business to the next generation one is of
support as a commissioner in the final
authority over the company. The next
orientation of class in life is that of the
ruler, the legislator and the military who is
of initiative relating to a certain societal
order, and who first of all, to the model,
has to prove himself as a hero or recruit in
a youth organization, and next has to follow
through in the form of taking up leadership.
Next is the one of initiative as a leader of
a certain group interest than on the basis of
his experience fit to operate as a politician
capable of mediating between the wanted and
the viable, after which finally at a later
age one has matured enough to be of the
chambers of advise or be an advisor in a more
independent position. From the next position
of the intellect caring for matters of
guidance is there first of all the position
of being a pupil in the context of a school,
then the position of being a teacher oneself
who as a counselor or therapist supports the
students or clients in their personal
evolution as one meanwhile arrives at one's
own practical insight. Next, with the
workload of teaching and supporting is at its
end, follows a period of reconsideration in
which one with the experience acquired looks
deeper into the wisdom and the traditions
founding the culture transmitted, so that one
next at a higher age being more detached,
austere and experienced with the spiritual
responsibility for a certain service of
honoring matters may care for the
commemoration of that wisdom: the priesthood,
the voice of the culture attained. Thus is
with this division each his life assigned a
place. It is evident that by the grace of the
classical scriptures and the actual human
reality the positions of the societal
identities as an absolute truth are fixed,
but that the person himself determines to
what extend one thing would lead to another,
or whether there would be the more abstract
or concrete reality thereof. You may picture
the complete of it as an eight story
apartment-building with sixteen apartments
each floor and three rooms per apartment.
That is the building humanity lives in, with
each and all living there going up and down
in the lift of transcendence or elevation and
moving through the rooms of their apartments
according their experience. Sometimes, on the
average four times in their lives, they move
to another apartment when they according
their age change their status.
The
problem with these identities of the
so-called varnâs'rama castes is
the identification with them, the false pride
that people can take in them and shut each
other out with. In filognosy we stress, after
the concept of vedic reform of Lord Caitanya,
the importance that these identities are
positions in a fixed ' Game
of Order'
of developing quality, but that one is free
to move up and down the ladder to heaven.
Naturally you evolve through these castes.
So, although by birth you may be predisposed
for a certain class, by nature you may follow
another route. Therefore do I for you call it
status-orientation groups or societal
identities. The status is something natural
of age that changes over time, the class
likewise is something that may change because
of personal choices and an education. Even
though one doesn't seem to choose one's birth
do things, as was explained in the previous
dialogue, work only right with respect for a
certain process of transcendence in which we
develop the needed quality. By this quality
we develop the consciousness that offers one
the choice, that thus gives someone his
freedom. Only this way can the caste-system,
or society of rank and order, he matters of
class, be checked and protected against false
claims on the basis of identification and
pride. One isn't better by one's societal
position, birth, age or education, one is
better by one's consciousness, one's talent
to transcend, discriminate and choose, by
one's abstract ability to oversee matters and
keep order and thus stay absorbed in the
goodness and knowledge so necessary for the
love for our fellow man.
You
say you can't chose your life. Isn't that
determined by your previous
lives?
Your
present life is undoubtedly the consequence
of what you did before; whether those
previous lives happened in this life of lie
more in the sphere of other incarnations of
yourself or of others of your identification
that preceded your life. So I might have been
René Descartes and you might have been
Sigmund Freud and now we have to figure it
out what it means to be analytically of
reason with the soul. Even though you at any
moment have the option to change lanes in
your life, is it so that once you head in a
certain direction, you have to accept the
consequences. In that sense you do not have
the choice then. But up to the point of death
one can repent and thus pave the way for a
better life thereafter. It is not the soul
that dies, but the body that dies, that is
the basic assumption of yoga and thus also of
our filognosy.
So
what does it mean 'Playing the Game of
Order'
It
means that we accept the caste-system, but
then with respect for the process of
selfrealization in transcendence we also call
emancipation. The identity of a caste or
status-orientation group should be
functional. One and the same identity can
operate at different levels in different
modes of experience. That together is the
game of order in which each person finds his
life's mission according his level of
transcendence, his status, his class, his
experience and his style of progress going up
and down the ladder to heaven.
This
is all very much for me to
understand...
Yes
of course, it takes you your whole life to
figure out who you are and what your walk
through life would be. To oversee this in
full no one can but the Supreme Lord. He
grants you the vision through the disciplic
succession of the teachers of the tradition
that keeps the vedic literature in function.
I can only tell you as a pupil of them
studying and singing to the scriptures myself
and so be happy to combine for you the
different truths of the original science of
yoga and the options of spiritual knowledge
in the six departments of
filognosy.
So
there is a specific type of culture behind
it?
Yes,
in my case the paramparâ, the
disciplic succession of instructors or
âcâryas of the
Caitanya-vaishnavas, as they are called. They
are in the streets of the west , but also in
the east that way, represented by the monks
of Lord Vishnu who are known as the Hare
Krishnas. Many fear them because they can be
fanatic about this disciplic succession and
the worship of the gurus belonging to it. But
you do not have to go to the monastery where
they live. Albeit you very quickly might also
pick this all up there with them, is it also
for Muslims and Christians quite normal not
all to be monks and nuns in service of the
monasterial order. That order constitutes the
school of learning. Normally people attend
schools to graduate and take their
responsibility in society. Also with
Buddhists it is quite normal for youngsters
to be a monk and then later on be good
fathers and husbands in the normal society.
But anyhow some type of systematic respect is
needed not to forget these dialogues and be
firm in your belief, and so it applies to the
order of time as we have discussed too; you
must put the systematic respect for this
originally religious matter on your calendar.
This personal section says: if you want to
be respected as a person, you will also have
to respect other persons, and why not the
original teachers, the Lords and Prophets of
the religions? Religion means reading,
connecting again, and so do we as devotees of
the complete join on lunar signal days to
read and sing the Bhâgavatam,
the original book where all the wisdom
concerning the vedic order filognostically is
combined in one story; the Story of the
Fortunate one, the One of fortune that you
also want to be and - partly - can become by
the grace of God.
I
have to go to India? Or must I go to
Jerusalem or Mecca being a Christian, a Jew
or a Muslim?
Well
you may go on a pilgrimage to get initiated
into the routines, philosophy and social
structure of the religion and forget your
erroneous past there, but you will have to
return and pick up your life here where you
were destined to live. The Muslims say, you
have to do it once in your life. But who says
what a holy place would be? A place is holy
by the people assembling there. So can you,
next to India, also go to Lourdes or Santiago
the Compostella, or visit the pope. Sometimes
it is enough to meet a strong representative
of the teaching on the road. He represents
all the wisdom and purity and the remembrance
of him may suffice to set you on the right
course and keep you there. Thus some people
are perfectly satisfied with their own
pundit, imam, parson or reverend being holy
enough. Let's say that it is not bad to look
beyond your own horizon and realize what's
more in the world about this.
So
filognosy is not especially Indian
then?
In
my case it is a mixture of the christian
background I have, the experience with
professional psychotherapy and scientific
methodology I had as a graduated
psychologist, and the change to yoga with it
that followed my being faced with the
indifference of our materialist society. But
a Muslim may stay a Muslim visiting the Sufis
and return from Mecca just to participate as
a perfect and sanctified equal in the same
game of order that we talked about and are
involved in the two of us. The filognosy
binds the different religions and personal
stories of selfrealization in the gnosis, in
the knowledge of the spirit, in the person of
God and in the factual reality of time in
relation to the forcefield of the ether and
of life we deal with.
And
how about all those guru's and
teachers?
They come
indeed in all shapes and sizes. The basic
duality for their division is found in the
difference between the discipline and the
source 0f knowledge. As for the source of
knowledge there are three kinds of teachers:
the co-believers who, more on a basis of
equality, assist by counsel and deed and
initiate you by example and inspiration in
the field; the teachers of the in succession
transmitted spiritual and intellectual
disciplines and religious traditions that are
of instruction; and there are the gurus from
within that are known by the scriptures.
These three types of teachers are also known
by three different disciplines so that one in
fact has nine different types of
guru-disciplines or individual mentors for
the spiritual. The three disciplines are what
the indian calls brahman, paramâtma
and bhagavân: the
impersonal, the local and the personal with
God. Thus one arrives at the table as shown
below. The teachers of initiation are first
of all, if not your parents, the therapist
who teaches you to respect yourself, the
other person and the rules in general; next
we have the new ager introducing you into the
principles of the true self and teaching you
how to meditate; and following are there the
filognostics and other representatives of the
spiritual traditions teaching the love for
the structure of knowledge in general and the
order of time, so that you may have a life
with the regulative principles. Gradually,
falling down and rising back to your feet
reorienting yourself gaining in experience,
evolves with this category of relief workers
a way of your own and a stable form of
association and culture of
instruction.
That
factual instruction originates from those
who, more formally as leaders, represent the
intellect, enlightenment and the tradition:
to begin with, the professors and other
teachers and thinkers of science and
scientific enlightenment who first of all
promote a sober sense for the right course of
arguing and the factual reality with the
seeker; then there are the spiritual
philosophers and mystics of the spiritual
type of enlightenment teaching you to be your
own man and assume your responsibility with
the knowledge; and at last we have the
theologians, priests and teachers of example
in disciplic succession (the so-called
paramparâ âcâryas)
who introduce you into the holy scriptures
and the culture of maintenance, or the
religion of reconnecting time and again in
ritual, contemplation and prayer.
The
teachers from within are christian-wise the
Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, but
filognostically seen do we see them more as
the different aspects of God of creation,
destruction and maintenance, in which the
Holy Spirit or the Absolute Truth stands for
the principle of the Creator in service of a
way of thinking that can be shared - the
homology; the Son stands for the principle of
de Destroyer removing all obstacles in the
way of one's belief, the karma, and
the Maintainer stands for the Father who,
unseen from the beyond, brings you your
stability of consciousness, your culture,
welfare, happiness, association, community
sense and durability. The latter three are
exclusively known through the scriptures and
demand, for the purpose of living with God
from within, a certain course of learning
with the before mentioned groups of teachers.
In India are those scriptures the three times
six bibles or Purânas of
Vyâsadeva that next to the
s'ruti of the Vedas directed at the
rituals and the Upanishads directed at
the philosophy, constitute the smriti
nucleus of the hindu-culture remembered in
the stories. An exception to this rule of
scriptural direction is formed by the
incarnation of the Supreme Personality, the
so-called avatâra, who
independent of the place and time, takes up
another form time and again to resettle this
entire array of teachers and their business.
Only in Him there is full remembrance,
continuity and control over the fields, the
knowledge and the material (see also the
definition of teacher/guru/filognostic).
Can
you give examples of these types of
teachers?
O.K.
Freud was one of the first real
psychotherapists. From him we learned to be
alert about time schedules, opposing the
'Father' and sexual matters. Osho Rajneesh,
the guru from Poona, was the godfather of the
New Age movement who presented himself as an
equal friend. Temporarily engaged in a New
Age center set up in resp0nse to his
teachings, found the concept of filognosy its
existence in 1993, originally as an idea of
regularly talking and meditating together.
Avatar Sathya Sai Baba is with His
multicultural sarva-dharma approach a
textbook example of a filognostic in the
religious sense, of someone who, with a lot
of love for the integration of knowledge on a
vedic basis, prepares one for the tradition
and the sciptures. Of Him e.g. we have the
four times six division of the day as also a
collection of vahini-books
in which He introduces the vedic culture his
own way. The greek philosopher Socrates is
one of the great spiritual teachers who laid
the foundation for modern western science.
From him we have the principle of this
dialogue. The indian Krishnamurti is a
typical philosopher of spiritual
enlightenment who gave a lot of directions
and thus contributed in the being motivated
for the regulative principles, and Swami A.
C. Bhaktivedanta Prabhupâda is the
textbook example of the teacher of liberation
in devotional service, the monk, the
âcârya or teacher of
example, teaching people the love for as well
the reform-minded as the traditional of the
culture of vaishnavism, de culture of Vishnu.
From him we have the books of Vyâsa as
they are, Sanskrit and all.
The
Father, the Son and Holy Ghost we know in the
abstract sense from Christianity, but as real
persons we know them from the Hindus who have
given them in their eighteen bibles - the
Purânas - of Vyâsadeva,
six for each demigod, the names of resp.
Vishnu, S'iva and Brahmâ. The latter
from-within-culture of selfrealization is
typically the indian way to bring to life the
diversity of the different disciplines in
endless rows of different temples,
traditions, holy people and schools of
learning.
How
must I think about that notion of the ether
you regularly refer to?
Regard
the ether as the force field of the universe
in the form of a galaxy, which binds together
the stars, and thus also our sun, moon and
earth in their collective orbiting the black
hole in the middle of the milky-way which, in
the scriptures, is also presented as a golden
mountain, the mountain Meru. It is a mountain
of stars in the middle that, if we peek
through a telescope, can also be seen by us
in other galaxies, which sometimes also,
astronomically and vedically being older,
look like a golden egg. The force field of
the ether is the unity of the coordination,
the covering, of all forces influencing us in
the material world. Thus there are factually
three types of ether: the one of the linear
time of the expanding universes in space-time
which is represented by Mahâvishnu or
Kâranodakas'ayî-vishnu; the one
of the galaxy of this universe stabding for
the cyclic of time, for the cakra of the
Vishnu who is called
Garbhodakas'âyî-vishnu, and the
one of the local order, the normal
radio-ether of the planets and the sun called
Ks'irodakas'âyi -vishnu. It's all about
the harmonious experiencing of that unity of
Vishnu, and for that reason is it advised to
respect, next to the order of the sun and the
moon as discussed earlier, the celestial sky
by celebrating your birthday every year
twenty minutes later or, being less after the
ego, at least respect the galactic new year
which from the year 2000 on midnight (from
the 6th-7th of July the closest to the
center) each year falls about a twenty
minutes later. Relating to that cakra-order,
the order of the big wheel, which by Lord
Vishnu with the Hindus is wielded as a
weapon, you must try to be of respect for His
spiritual order, the order that Vyâsa
teaches us to follow in his books. The Lord,
as our spiritual teacher within, is the sound
in the ether and one must see Him so as the
impersonation and personal integrity thereof.
Also must that ether itself again be regarded
as His presence. In the
Bhâgavatam is stated that He,
the Unseen One, is visible in the form of the
celestial sky. The movement of the celestial
sky spinning, de so-called redshift, and the
gravity-lens effect around stars, do to His
linear, cyclic and local Time, therefore
constitute the proof of the existence of the
ether as being the effect of the unity of its
force field, to be precise. Dhruva e.g., a
vedic ruler from the Bhâgavatam
(see
4.8
& 9),
came to his realization in the relatively
short period of a couple of months, by
meditating, on his one leg, on the in the
ether unified spirit, with in his mind's eye
the celestial sky, the cakra-order, the order
of the time of Vishnu. In doing yoga it is
all about this control of the forces of ones
spirit and body in the ether. Respect
therefore the cakra-order of the true time of
the sun, the moon and the stars and guard
against the rut of the linear, clouding and
commercial abuse; it is the natural order
with the ether that gives you the control of
Vishnu, the control superseding all other
forms of control. Also the vedic
three-footer, the gâyatrî
that we spoke of, reminds you of the
association and harmony with the ether in
your respect for the natural proportions, the
measures of time that represent the effect of
that great force in nature. Therefore you
practice that mantra three times a day being
good with the yoga-exercises and with other
devotional practices in the sphere of your
association, in the sphere of that field of
action. The ether is also considered to be
the first effect, of the Lord in the form of
the Time, in creation
(S.B.
11.22:
19,
and in the Brahma-sûtra,
pada
3.1,
1-7);
it is a basic element of creation that is
part of the Absolute Truth. Factually you can
only respect it; to lord it over, to desire a
certain outcome or result, in a material
sense, is quite useless. Make your birthday
e.g. a holiday. The ulterior motive in
controlling the force is the dark side, so
shun that, for it prepares you a fall-down,
it'll bewilder you. That is the true meaning
of absolute truths; you have to see and
respect matters exactly as they are of
nature. To stay sober is the command of
transcendence.
How
about the emancipation from karma to
dharma?
There
is enlightenment and liberation, civil
virtues and the way of the devotees. Let me
explain. Enlightenment is not just the
reasoning from your own as we sometimes think
in the West, but the end result of giving up
desire in which the entire weight of your
material concerns falls away so that you're
literally lighter. Of course you carry a load
of habits with you in which you foster
desires. That we call karma. The karma is the
being entangled in fruitive activities, the
work done for a result, the craving for an
effect, for success, money, esteem, sex and
all the other material rewards you can think
of. But in the enlightened state the rewards
seem more like a burden. One has changed
one's mode or model of thought valuing things
differently. Such a paradigm shift, which the
japanese Zen-buddhists call satori, can be a
sudden experience. Suddenly you see the
clouds from the other side then. The reality
stays the same, the vision changes. Today one
believes with relativism that the element of
the ether does not exist, but tomorrow one
might have respected and confirmed the ether
by scientific empiral evidence and thus
further elaborate on the notion with the
vedically ruled paradigm of filognosy that
does depart from the connecting element and
so have a better life of respect for the
universe.
But the
teachers teach us that enlightenment is just
the beginning, you are really only liberated
when you manage to serve that cause of
non-desire and felicity. Beatitude, the
ultimate state of consciousness, bliss and
eternity aspired in emancipation, in the
process of becoming a person, is reached only
through serving that cause. And so become the
enlightened step by step devotees following
the slow path.
There is
also the fast lane of joining the monks and
skipping all the materialistic concerns at
once. All desires are redirected in the
service of the Lord then, but the end-result
is the same. Also the liberated monks and
nuns must struggle to find enlightenment with
the being bound to the order of their service
and so, in a way, that could be the slow lane
too. One has to find one's own way, one's
svarûpa, one's original position
of service in being liberated in devotion and
being enlightened in non-desire. Not just
monks are devoted, every serious adult has
some type of devotion with a certain science
of respect. This can be deeply ingrained in
the soul as an essential mark of identity
present there right from one's birth. The
realization of this svarûpa or
original identity of service to the
dharma is the goal of the
emancipation process. In this process one
learns to listen to the scriptures, sing the
songs that celebrate the person of God,
remember the Maintainer, the Lord, to serve
the institute, the master, the devotees as
well as the form of God chosen, do the
prayers and mantras, become a trusted friend
and at last accept the guru from within in
full surrender to the teachings. One says
first you see Him before you, then you see
Him within you and then you become that part
of Him you always were, namely your
svarûpa.
What
are the hindrances?
Simply
stated your attachments. As a young adult,
but also later, you fight the being attached
with regulation in regard of the order of
time; the desire, the lust, the sexual
attachment is gradually overcome by
regulation. In the voluntary acceptance of
frustration of the lust, a mind of penance is
needed as said. The desire for money is
settled by economy. The society taxes
the moneymaker and forces him to act
responsibly with the means of exchange. Money
and responsibility, means and end , must be
linked. Money is a burden, a responsibility
which, as also Jesus confirmed, can be a
serious hindrance on your way to heaven. So
this is regulated. On the dole you may not
possess more than so much, with a private
business you may not evade taxes and with a
salary you must be careful not to have a
mortgage to high. So material needs and
desires are neatly taken care of thus. Also
the religion is there to link you up
and remind you of the scriptural truth that
you tend to forget about in your material
life. Stay focussed is the message in the
early stages of emancipation. Also dedicating
one's labor to the cause of transcendence is
an important directive. The profit-minded ego
can oppose the spiritual mind, and therefore
there is the uniting in working for a good
cause as a volunteer. At least part of one's
time should be reserved for it, just to keep
the gate to heaven open and stay motivated
for the joy of life shared with all
creatures. But that liberation also
involves consciously countering the
time-system of making money and having
conflicts in political opposition. The
civil virtues thus seen, of the
regulation of the lust, the money, the
religion and the liberation, only work
progressively if the authentic order is
remembered. Religion offers the culture of
remembrance, liberation offers the original
order of nature and our humanity as an a
option of choice that must be served if one
also, or even entirely, wants to pull one's
weight in society in a selfless sense. Not
doing so you will be a victim of the modern
neurosis with all its psychological symptoms
of a low self-esteem, uncontrolled emotions,
anxieties and what not. In general it is good
to remember that the hindrances of culture
(sex, money, forgetting and ego), of
nature (the modes, the climate, calamities)
and of your own lack of discipline (your
disbelief, your psychology) must be
overcome.
So
to sum this dialogue up: emancipating from
civil virtues I have to play the game of
order watching the ether, the teachers and
the hindrances?
Yes,
so it is with the organized respect for the
person in as well the sense of mature self
realization as in a religious sense. It is
difficult to demarcate the two. In a
political sense though things are not all
said yet. That is the final
dialogue.
Dialogue
six III-b Rhetoric
Now
we must discuss the necessity and the way to
defend what was realized in the previous
sections. We must find closure with the
filognosy and arrive at comprehension. The
cause must be promoted and defended. The
practice is called rhetoric: the way we speak
of it, not just from impressing and
persuading, but as a standard prayer to keep
in mind.
Necessity?
Do I have to preach?
Yes
and no. Yes it is necessary to tell others as
far as they are open to it, because helping
others you will help yourself, but preaching
you must not; you may do so, but you better
speak being welcome with your science. Never
impose the love that has to keep it's arms
open. You may defend and help to defend, that
is the Kingdom of God, but be apprehensive
asserting yourself, it may result in the
opposite with you meeting your own assertion.
True love is the love of God this way. Love
is love in freedom and confidence. Blessed
are the ones who see it coming their way, the
classics say. The filognosy of it must step
by step become part of your identity. So also
it must in the end become part of our, your
and mine, educational system. But pushing it,
must the one desiring and attacking with it
always return to where he came from and find
his peace there. Not the conquest of the
earth is the purpose, but the conquest of
heaven. That is where your salvation lies.
This so is your honor, this is your defense.
So take pride in it, but be careful with
formalization. Formalizing it all by
institutes of control may not go at the cost
of the dynamic nature and freedom of choice
and selfrealization of you as an individual
as well as others being happy with themselves
to their own standards. See it more as a
system of prayer, the prayer to have a normal
life as a normal human being that can be a
model, a beacon for others. So, expect
nothing and be glad with what you have. Don't
try to win, be the winner.
So
I have to pray now?
Let's
say prayer means to be directing the mind for
the cause of filognosy.
So
what is the prayer of filognosy? We discussed
so many issues that a whole Bible doesn't
seem to be enough, not even a pile of all the
holy books there are in the world. How to
find closure then?
Let's
stick to the fundamentals. The prayer set to
the basic values goes as follows:
'let peace with the natural order,
rule the world in respect of the truth,
sharing all with each in moderation,
loyal to the cause of unity'.
Filognosy refers to finding
stability with the soul in respect for the
order of time and the forcefield of the
ether. In this connection we have to remember
a few more basic things. First of all time
implies a dynamic living universe. It means
that no fixation will do in fact, like it is
with a mechanical prayer that performed
without understanding is as good as useless.
The order of time after all is the order of
the sun, the moon and stars right before us
irrespective our minding about it. The cloud
of thoughts we call the relative truth, the
actual reality of the by God given dynamic
universe that we, with the unity of the
ether, call the absolute. As long as we with
ourselves as the silent witness see
everything in motion is that the absolute
truth, but if we derive from fixations, from
material forms that are only relative truths,
do we have illusions. So does every image of
God constitute an illusion if we do not
uncover the silent witness with his
knowledge, eternity and bliss behind it; road
signs like the cakra order are permitted, nay
mandatory, of course, but the person must be
known.
So
first we discriminate between the absolute
and the relative truth?
Right,
the Lord is the time of the universe and not
so much the time we make of it; that
self-righteous time is more like what one has
with the political 'demigods', by whom an
adaptation to the original order is mediated.
God is the original order, the love of the
goodness as it is by nature in its entirety.
If we fail to respect that dynamical complete
because of our fixations and preconceptions,
are we in a state of illusion. The basic
problem thus is the denial of the error we
tend to have sticking to our human concepts
of relative truth. The mechanism is called
'the psychology of denying the error'.
Because of that mechanism is there the misery
of living in a world of conflict in the
politicized false ego of identifying oneself
more with the fixations than with the object
of the fixations and the unity of and with
the ether in the beyond.
So
we fix on the change and do not change on
that fix?
Right,
politics is all about order. In political
debate one relativizes one's concept of order
opposing another one. Successful politics are
the politics that know of the absolute truth
behind all this practically necessary
discussion. Successful filognosy - the word
you pronounce as philognosy - means we count
with the different options of science,
spirituality and religion. That means that
relating to God in the form of time and the
ether we basically accept the four positions
of fixing us on the truth concerning the
order that we already with the first section
of methodology realized by proper argument.
This is no new insight; it was defended 5000
years ago already by sage Vyâsa in
the Bhâgavata Purâna (in
11.21:
10).
1)
One may accord by setting a
clock to the sun. That is the first
scientific option of externally validating
the clock to make
it a
tempometer.
This option is most efficient; one doesn't
waste one's energy on deviance and its
rationalization, but it makes for a
completely different mind and culture. And
that could mean maladaptation not counting
with the existing culture of a settled and
agreed upon deviance and compensation.
That is the risk of this option of
shifting one's paradigm all
together.
2) The
second option is that of
comparison. Natural time is the
thesis of our original nature and standard
time is the practical and cultural
antithesis of relativity. The
counter-argument is that the relative of
standard time on itself gives an endless
debate without an authority. Therefore the
conclusion must be that standard time can
only be accepted with the authority of a
tempometer
telling the position of the sun. In
summary then we say that the time is best
managed with two clocks and not with one:
a master tempometer and a slave of
societal entanglement in pragmatical
arguments. As long as the dog is on the
leash the animal can be accepted. The
system as a necessary prison of
compensations we cannot do without just
like that.
3)
The third option is that of
discourse. In political. scientific
and spiritual discourse one can maintain a
mind, a cloud of thoughts that compensate
for the difference that the culture with
its false absolutes makes with the
absolute and irrefutable of nature's
dynamic reality. Therefore do we after the
Hindus speak of the political age of
quarrel. By debate, by a conscious effort
for reason and logic we compensate for our
failure of following the dynamical of
nature. We are bound to the cross of a
fixation of culture. We need an accord, a
fixed order of time. That attachment
constitutes a threat to our sanity and
intelligence, since the attachment leads
to passion in denial of alternatives and
the passion itself to the aggression of
being stuck in the illusion of dead
matter; the aggression so manifesting in
opposition overrules the discrimination
and thus leads to bewilderment. So the
constant effort to stay reasonable with
that possible failure of your and my
memory and intelligence has to express
itself in discourse: who aggresses is the
loser; one has to discuss it constantly to
assure oneself of the reason and logic
that does justice to the person that we
originally were, still are and have to be.
Reason is the way.
4)
The fourth option is that of ritualized
respect. By ceremonies of a sportive,
religious or some other formal kind like
bowing to each other before a judo-fight
or lifting the chalice in a holy mass, or
handing out a medal of honor to a
war-hero, we can assure us of the respect
we need to have for each other and for the
Lord or the hero of our reverence as
manifestations of the will and nature of
God. The more regular this respect is
shown the better it is. It is namely the
lack of respect for the person that we
suffer if we miss to serve the impersonal
of God in the form of the absolute of His
natural cyclic time of the sun, the moon
and the stars revolving and His oneness in
the ether. Thus do we by a ritualized
concept of celebration restore that
respect consciously in forgiveness with
those original sun, moon and stars we were
born to with our fallible material nature
of a certain culture. In this context we
speak of grace, forgiveness and salvation.
This is the fourth option.
And
this is what we say to people? Isn't that too
complex?
Yes
it is complex, but that is the reality we
have to accept being faithful to the method
concluding conscientiously. This is the
comprehension we need. The respect for the
person that we amount to with our systematic
approach of filognosy implies that we have to
deal with the complexity of a paradox. The
person is essentially unique, not just
spiritually but also materially by his very
genes, and any denial of it leads sooner or
later to an offense of misattribution, of
wrong categorization. So in a systematic form
of respect we have the problem that being
predictable by formal agreements the unique
of the person seems to be in danger of being
disrespected. But the problem can be solved.
The predictable unique we look for is exactly
the state of affairs in the universe. The
solar system is like a clock with nine or
eight hands: each moment it is perfectly
defining the unique of the moment while it is
still perfectly predictable by the laws of
Newton. So it is not necessary that the
unique is forced by the denial of Newton with
quantum mechanical considerations of
energetic indeterminacy. That is scientific
overkill. Newton is perfect for people
behaving normally on a normal planet. We need
to be down to earth in touch with the planet
and not scientifically be obsessed with
exceptions to the rule that only really are
of importance on a macrocosmic scale. The
respect of the dynamic time of the sun and
the moon to the backdrop of the stars and the
ether makes our lives interestingly diverse,
but still predictable enough to be able to
count on each other. There is, in filognosy
with the principles equipoised to the fields
of action with the civil virtues, thus no
need for the difficult boring rut of linear
time and the associated uncertainty equations
to avoid that rut; let the rebel rest in
peace with the predictable unique dynamics of
the universe. It were the fixations against
it which he fought, not the original
nature.
With
the being predictable in a dynamic sense,
what do we say about the virtues in relating
to the fields of action and their order of
time?
The
civil virtues to the common man are explained
as the ones relating to religiosity,
liberation, lust and economy. (artha,
dharma, kâma, moksha). These
matters require regulation with the B, P,C
and S- fields of action (see
dialogue 1).
1)
B (of business - artha). The
economy is settled in the business field
covering a quarter of your life: six hours
of work for six days a week practically
making for a thirty-six hour workweek of
which we have 48 a year (see also dialogue
three and four). The b-days extra
indicated on the lunar calendar are there
to contrast the S- day of your club-life.
At these B-days you get together for
discussing practical matters in the
business sphere or, being on your own,
doing other practical studies of some kind
(see Full
Calendar of
Order).
2)
P (of private - dharma). The
religiosity is next as an individual daily
duty there to warrant the quality of your
personal life covered in the private field
in which one:
a - cares for oneself for six hours
actively during the day,
b - cares for one's own nature and body
sleeping for six hours each day and
one
c - cares for doing one's personal
meditations set apart from the association
of the club, the church, the mosque or
temple.
The religiosity consists of the talent to
retrieve your original nature and sense of
duty. Nature and natural time is the form
of God you worship in the private sphere.
Most people meditate on the t.v. to have a
heart for the stories of the world and be
committed to what's going on. Not much ego
is involved, one meditates on the
universal form of the Lord so to speak in
the form of His diversity in the world,
with in the back of one's mind the silent
hope that the sweet person of God will
manifest His two-armed normal form before
you again in being a friend in the battle
of life. One is liberated, finds one's
devotion, in the next discussed S-field of
one's favorite club, but one finds
enlightenment in the private sphere where
one takes responsibility for oneself and
distances oneself from the world. This can
only be done stability under the control
of a
clock running to the
sun.
Without it will the karma timesystem
sucked in by the t.v. and political
railroad-clock will seize you by a
soap-series e.g. or a movie watched too
late. The t.v. is a means of communication
with many advantages, but can also, as
said before, be the cyclops, the monster,
that locks you up in the house - like
Ulysses was in the cave - in false oneness
, of estrangement, loneliness and
illusion. So you may live this private
interest for six days a week tops, but the
seventh day you must respect the C-field
of the social cakra-days.
Married people
must take care of at least one quality
time evening to spend with the family and
bachelors must at least once a week spend
an evening with a friend, relative or
other intimate at home or, being without,
at least close the t.v. down for one day
to find time for him/herself in an inner
association with the help of a good book
e.g. These are the P-days on the cakra
calendar that never coincide with the
C-days of going downtown. The
cakra-calendar is de calendar that shows
the order of the moon as projected on the
solar calendar. Also at the fifteenth
cakra-day you must hearten this field but
then without the materially endeavoring of
doing your job. This is an extra day of
study and fasting in the private sphere on
which you with your schedules leap back to
the dynamics of the universe. Not doing so
will your life's tempo with 52 in stead of
48 weeks in a year be too high relative to
the lunar order.
3)
C (of Cakra - kâma).
Following are the holidays not saved up to
a 'thirteenth month' of four weeks to lie
on a foreign beach at the end of the year
you worked. This department of the lust
for a natural, unregulated existence free
from the cultural dictates is settled at
the seventh and fourteenth day of the
cakra calendar. They are more or less set
to the order we had with the abolished
ancient roman, julian calendar with its
signal days of a solar Ides, Kalends and
Nones. The cakra days or holidays spread
through the year are there for the
regulation of your lusts. You walk the dog
so to speak down town an let it sniff its
way around naturally. This builds and
maintains your community sense and thus
you make friends at the social cakra
days..
4
S (of spiritual - moksha).
The liberation is finally settled by
the lunar calendar on the signal days of
the astronomical lunar phases that
contrast and never coincide with the
specific B-days thereof. At these
spiritual and/or sportive S-days in the
club-field one studies the fixations. In
the form of books and songs, but also in
the form of concepts of association like
your favorite game of sport, you respects
the rituals of the fixed routines you
perform to exercise the respect with; the
respect needed to return to the concept of
the ether as was fixed by the rules of the
game, the holy book or another fixation
like e.g. a fixed route for strolling.
Thus you are liberated from all
materialistic concerns, since you at these
days do not try to add to, change or seek
it elsewhere. But correcting errors you
may always. These are your factual sundays
of not working for the money or another
result. You only care for getting together
then to remember how it all should be in
dharma, the original duty to the
nature of the soul, in the in
moksha being liberated from the
karma, the load, the cross you
carry in the business field.
In
short we say: business and club life balances
the virtue of the financial and liberation
interests to the moon; and the private and
social life balances the being virtuous with
the religious and lusty interests to the sun.
The cakra fifteenth-days and the two-monthly
leap days are there to fast and study and
your normal days of work must be balanced in
being up for others and yourself for twelve
hours with equally resting and meditating for
the other half of the day. Not being this
systematic, and failing to be of respect for
the regulative principles, you will be
devoured by the cyclops, the one-eyed monster
thus of the commercial t.v.-time of the
karmic system that disqualifies you as a
selfrealizer. Do understand that this
schedule is but a general directive; if you
want to avoid other participants in this must
you plan everything a day later e.g., but if
you want to meet everyone of it and with it,
as also everyone on another frequency, then
is this the way.
How
are these regulative principles defended
again?
They
are respected in the filognostic prayer that
says: be truthful, be pure, be of penance and
be compassionate. Satya, tapas, s'auca,
dâyâ. That's it. They are the
ones opposite to the animal values of the
sleeping, eating, mating and fighting that
human beings have in comon with the animals.
Sometimes we translate it with: truthfully
and faithfully, we promise to share and
care. That sentence can be expressed with
someone else as a kind of vow to confirm
one's relation in filognosy. From then on one
may greet each other with saying
cakra! to be reminded of the order of
time and the harmony therewith in the ether.
As a hand gesture one can spin an inward
upward held index finger. Or spiritually one
also says sometimes: being dutiful with the
truth, find love with nonviolence. Sometimes
one also says to the command: no booze or
drugs, no promiscuity, no gambling or running
after the money, and no unnecessary violence
in being a joyous vegetarian. In fact have
our cultures a history of improvising on
these basic rules, principles, commandments
and values that Christians know as the
commandments of not stealing, not coveting
but respecting, and not lying nor killing.
They are the rules of the societal game of
identities in progress that we people play to
be good humans.
Should
we also dress up a certain
way?
Not
necessarily, but in a formal setting you can
follow the next more or less scientific
filognostic color
code based
on observation: black for intellectuals
(originally christian clergy), gray for
business people (their common suit), red for
politicians (the king's color), and
beige/brown for laborers (as of an overall).
The status can be expressed with green for
celibates ('greenhorns'), white for married
people (like a bride), blue for withdrawn
people ('divorced and blue') and orange for
detached people (like a sâdhu in
India). You can improvise with your own style
of fashion in these colors, but you may also
group-wise agree upon a certain formal suit
with the status colors for the shirt and the
vocational colors for the trousers and jacket
and an eventual collar in the same color as
the suit. Even honorary signs as badges,
medals and stripes are possible if the social
situation demands such a confirmation of
identity. In formalization is
necessity always the master and not an
individual desire of ego. One must guard
against the possible falsehood of these
matters.
To set thing right:
there is. concerning appearances,
the formal and informal, the liberated and
the not liberated appearance. Casual wear is
informal and not liberated, viz. not of
service to the cause directly, nor dressed to
a certain command. One has the perfect right
to manifest an attachment of ego in one's own
time. People in uniforms are formal, but not
liberated either. They do service, but not to
the cause of the also - in filognosy -
formally confirmed differentiation of
identities.
The uniformed may not be of class-justice;
may not cherish any preference or partiality.
They serve the general order in defiance of a
corrupt personal identity. They derive thus
from a state (of emergency) that is contrary
to the ideal - and are thus possibly,
fighting the crime or terrorism, endangering
it in false oneness - and are so being bound
to the neglect of individual differences then
not of the liberated state. The liberated
state is always in service of the oneness
without defying the diversity. That is what
we call liberation and thus is a formal suit
of a filognostic as described, or a more
classically religious or spiritual appearance
of authority in defense of the human
identities, a representation we call formally
liberated. There is finally also the group of
the informally liberated. They are not so
much dressed up to a certain formal command
but do qualify as liberated because they
manifest their respect as a popular
representative in service to the cause of a
conscious individuality and accountability of
social order, viz they conform - be it
somewhat proud and vain sometimes - to
dress-codes in wearing tuxedo's, neckties,
gowns and other fair and neat 'sunday and
party' wear or 'evening' dress (see also
picture).
Healthy people easily change dress with a
good wardrobe. That's the norm in the end.
E.g. a police man can do his job in uniform,
be casual at home, dress up nicely to a party
and also be of a positive spiritual
identification participating in a religious
or spiritual ceremony. Such a man is closest
to the filognostic integrity of
appearance.
So
what is for the order of time and th ethet
the rhetoric in conclusion
then?
For
the natural order of time with the ether
in general
we say that: 'balanced to the fields of
action we accord, compare, discuss or
pray', the choice to the outdated
clock that is missing the wheel to follow the
sun is yours; just make sure you correct
yourself on the human error of being attached
to fallible fixations (practically you
correct your normal clock once each
cakra-week to step up to the sun). Leap it or
weep it. Compensations collapse and create
terror, so to accord is the best one can do
and that requires the leaping of the day, the
week, the month and the year, but that again
may at times also be too much at variance
with the actions of others. So don't be a
square and stiff, go with the flow but
remember what you know, and... beware of
false causality, the idea that there would be
one causal explanation of things; for time is
not just linear, but also cyclic and so there
are different types of causality. The chicken
and the egg you know, God and man, the
darwinian evolution theory and the biblical
creationist explanation, etc. Both arguments
of causality to these dualities are true, not
just one. There is a standard simile to this
diversity of visions: people describing God
and His order compare to five blind men
describing one and the same elephant. One man
says it is tight and firm, the other says it
is supple and thin, the other says it is
thick and solid, while the next one says it
is cool and hard with the fifth one saying
that it is small and hairy. They all touch
the same elephant but each describes a
different part: the trunk, the ears, the leg,
the tusk and the tail. Likewise there is one
Absolute Reality of God, but as many visions
of it as there are humanoids in the
universe.
And
what to this alternative consciousness then,
this idea of a better world that we need to
ward off depressions and such?
That
is covered by the classical truths of belief,
hope and love. However one is entangled in
the compensations with the differing,
discussing and praying, there is always the
scientific accord as an ideal to strive for,
to believe in, hope for and love with. Do not
condemn people for being entangled, nor
compliment them for it; fight with them
against illusions not against them with
illusions. The better world is the world
wherein everyone is eager in this, the world
wherein we do not have to fear our own
negligence and ignorance. E.g. do not fight
godlessness by considering the unemployed
godless; to call people unemployed in the
first place is an economically inspired
illusion of godlessness. For God no one is
unemployed. Illusion is the problem and
ignorance is the affliction. Materialism is
the disease and the tyranny of the -ism
constitutes the corruption. Filognosy is the
solution. And the practice of it with this
rhetoric is the cure. Never give up being a
servant of the syncretic view of the six-fold
philosophy of filognosy that essentially
says: methodical with the facts analyze
matters with respect for the principles of
spirituality so that with a systematic and
pious respect for the person you arrive at
proper comments and practical politics. So,
never turn against the method that gives the
proper argument and uncovers the truth. Never
deny the facts even though it is
paradigmatically challenging; never tire to
express your intelligence - artistically or
not - with analytic insight; never forget the
principles of conduct of truthfulness,
purity, penance and compassion; never give it
up to play the game of order making your
identity work however much you may fall down;
and finally never give up the politics of
delivering the right comment fitted and
effective to the place and time. You do not
have to become a politician as such, but your
honor commands sincerity and thus the
allegiance to this complete practice of
filognosy. Be clear, clarity is love. Love
for the other is love for yourself is love
for God.
How
to fight the devil then?
By
keeping order, purifying yourself fighting
your errors and by being the example as
described: sing o philosopher, respect the
person with heart! But do not impose your
utopia, that we now simply call the world
without sloth, but do not forsake it either
as a model for others freely to choose for it
they want to. Keep the door open as said, but
drag no one against his will into your
heaven. After all it is something
confidential and personal, the conversion and
the faith. Always remember to be grateful,
feel obliged for what saved you and stay of
progress in critical self-control with your
fixations. Never be too sure of that
disc-weapon of order, it can kill the user
too. Be faithful but not compulsory, be
progressive but not offensive or chaotic.
Remember where you came from and where you
are heading for. The moment is nothing but
the realization of the past going into the
future. Do not separate the three. The God of
Time is known that way.
What
vision must by people be assumed in order to
find the fortune they are seeking in life?
And what is the consequence of adopting a
faulty approach in this?
The
six opulences of the fortune (bhaga)
linked to the six filognostical visions
(darshanas), viz. the one of
intelligence and knowledge linked to the
nyâya or the argumentation of
philosophy; the power linked to the science
of vais'eshika; the beauty linked to
the sânkhya or analysis; the
renunciation linked to the yoga or the
connectedness; the fame linked to the
mîmâmsâ or the
religion, and finally the riches linked to
the vedânta or the comments of
politics, form, put in a table, an indication
of what the consequence is of not finding the
right definition of the fortunate, of missing
the correct balance between the fulness
and the vision: one is then a materialist
with a conviction out of balance or of a
corrupt determination.
The
table above shows the thirty forms of
materialistic imbalance one thus may notice.
Materialism thus seen can be described as a
lack of balance between the opulence of
welfare at the one hand and the order of life
and thought belonging to it at the other
hand. One's thinking, out of balance in the
fields of action and the civil virtues,
erodes to an -ism, a one-sided conviction,
which, at the cost of others, is bent upon a
certain idea of happiness which rather
demonstrates the lack the lack one suffers
with the conviction at hand. These -isms may,
rising to political power degrade into
despotic regimes. For that reason we seek the
filognosy of the balance in these matters.
Philosophy e.g. is in balance thriving on the
love for knowledge, but building on the
concept of power it degrades to the
relativism of postmodernism, defined by the
propensity to denounce, from the desire to
control all, all absolutes blocking in the
way. Thus there are in theory six correct
forms of according in fullness and vision,
which in the filognosy together define the
fortunate person as a person of God:
knowledge is fulfilled, is balanced, with
philosophy, power with science, beauty with
analysis, renunciation with connectedness,
fame with religion and riches are balanced in
politics. Only in filognosy, in the spiritual
knowledge of âtma-tattva, the
reality and principle of the soul, is there a
chance for the full realization of all
opulences as being the means, and the visions
as the goals to be attained. All other
attempts to have one-sided, with another
opulence, the same vision in mind leads to
the imbalance of a certain -ism which can be
recognized as a form of materialism. The
imbalance then expresses itself as a foolish
or faulty way of linking a fullness of
fortune - or a means of knowing - to the
purpose of a certain vision. The corruption
consists of one's taking the means for an
end. The imbalance is what we normally have
to tolerate of materialism, but the
corruption is the obscuration of the vision
that must be fought. That twofold option also
applies tot the six forms of balance. They
constitute on themselves -isms again which
are the philosophies of defending a singular,
non-filognostical-syncretical equilibrium:
knowledge with philosophy leads at its best
to Hinduism, power with science leads
fulfilled to Buddhism, beauty with analysis
leads in perfection to Taoism of which
Confucianism - despite of the competition
between the schools - is the rhetoric,
renunciation with connectedness leads
enlightened to gnosticism or spirituality in
general, fame with religion leads enlightened
to Universal Sufism and riches with politics
perfectly combined leads to Vaishnavism. To
that knows Hinduism for safeguarding her
integrity three more sub -isms because of
caste falsehood: Parsism, Sikhism and
Jainism. Filognosy thus does not belong to
gnosticism or Vaishnavism, but gnosticism or
Vaishnavism is a part of filognosy. The
filognosy of the soul is inclusive, covers
everything, but the -ism of of the ego is
exclusive, it limits itself to a single
contribution. So must filognosy therefore not
be counted among one of the other more
materialistic, foolish -isms, even though
they constitute an element thereof when one
describes the weaknesses of the individual,
false ego or a collective Superego. So does
filognosy itself easily degrade into
structuralism when the reference to classical
divisions is abandoned and one is making for
an all too idiosyncratic concept of dividing
matters. This e.g. is often found in the
science of psychology, where different
divisions of personal traits in the
personality theories tumble in such a way
over one another that it is all too easy to
doubt the authority and the integrity of that
science.
So
how to see the past and from that the
future?
Culturally
we have the value systems of the different
religions and political cultures struggling
for balance and comprehension. Everything
added complicates the matter for repressive
progress is progress in denial which is no
real progress at all. Progress means to find,
to cover, the complete in all its complexity
and thus be stable in one's consciousness.
Repression sooner or later leads to a
fall-down. The god of destruction is there to
overcome hindrances, the god of creation is
there to find structure and the god of
maintenance is there to be of goodness,
happiness and endurance.
But
I mean in detail, how to think of our
cultural inheritance and what is the future
of it?
In
short we on this earth first had the vedic
order teaching us the yoga in all its
diversity of philosophy, service and
devotion; then we had the Chinese to tell us
of the balance of Tao, the way with the
yin and yang of the duality in
general and the sun and moon in relation to
the clearing of ether in particular - the
same heavenly bodies that meanwhile also were
defended by the ancient Egyptians and south
american Indians with their astronomical
respect for the gods; then we had the
Buddhists who taught us to find the reality
without the mind; then we had the Greek who
taught us the dialogue as the essence of the
reason by which we now conclude
filognostically; then we found parallel to
that the Jews (and their persian neighbors)
from whom we learned to live by the spirit of
the absolute, more than by miracles and outer
forms of God; next we had Christ who taught
us to carry our burden in compassion with our
fellow man; then we learned to know the
prophet Mohammed stressing the importance of
respecting God by the pure of the sun and the
moon again; then we had reform and
enlightenment to remind us of our personal
responsibility to live more to the spirit
than to the letter; and finally we learned to
know the democracy as the challenge to cover
the complete of the complexity of our
multicultural world order. This is how you
should see the past of us humans on this
planet. It has been the struggle to arrive at
the comprehension of order as I have
mentioned in the beginning of this last
dialogue. The future is to find stability all
together as mankind with first of all
balancing the different options of the fields
of action in our personal lives and secondly
in our representing those interests in the
form of according political parties as well
find the balance. The legislative power, the
political world, so will have to count with
financial, national, social and private
interests in an equal manner in specially, as
we saw in the second dialogue, to this
filognosy arranged, election groups
superseding the nepotistic, political
tendencies so that the democracy finds
stability in a representative parliament
properly tuned to the executive power of
state-departments following the same division
of interest of the statusorientations.
The future
is that we will accept and know our
identities in their inevitably being linked
to the profession, the civil status connected
to one's age, the level of abstraction in
transcendence and the individual mode of
experience from self that by the ego arrives
at wisdom; and so learn to play the game of
order with it and forget about all the
traumas of the class struggle of the early
nepotistic democracies and their dictatorial
perversions of notably the twentieth century.
Religions will always remain as classical
schools of learning, but none will ever
dominate the world. Consider them like the
chapters of a book, and then try to
appreciate the whole book. So too will
political parties never individually rule the
earth but rather find their place and
function according the basic duality and
analytic conclusion of the inscrutable
Oneness in diversity that is our soul and
heart, our God, love and our life in the
force field of the ether.
I
thank you Aadhar for the comprehensive view
of this complete of the order of time. It has
boggled my mind enormously, that complexity,
but now is it, given all these tools of
knowledge, it is all clear to me. Now I
realize what the time of my life is in the
sense of being reborn: it is the realization
of this filognosy.
The
site linear as a perfection of the causal
illusion:
|